Beauty or Sex?

[pretense78]

If you were required to choose, would you prefer to have someone who was extremely attractive physically but couldn't perform well sexually, or someone who was somewhat on the unattractive side, but could do things in bed you only saw in the circus? The attractive person might have more sexual experience technically, but this is just a "what if?"

[hooligan]

attractive and just do it so much we get good at it.

[rice cracker]

Omg, if they can't fuck, leave em. I ain't got time to train someone in.

[John0101]

Inner beauty or outer beauty? If it's inner beauty i'll stick with her. If she just got the face and body with lousy sex and converstation I don't think I can handle it.

[kboy75]

i'm a good teacher...

[stunninglyAsian]

I had a friend who would swear by less attractive girls being better in bed. He had this theory that the beautiful women could just lie there and not even make a sound because you would be so happy to have sex with a beautiful girl and that you could brag about it to your friends, so it really didn't matter what the sex was like. As for the less attractive girls, they knew they were busted and some guys would be ashamed to sleep with them because of their reputation, so they had to make it up by being fantastic in bed.

[Bhodi_Li]

Originally Posted by stunninglyAsian

As for the less attractive girls, they knew they were busted and some guys would be ashamed to sleep with them because of their reputation, so they had to make it up by being fantastic in bed.

Some damn good points in that.

[TB4000]

Go for the quote unquote "unattractive"(though what's attractive to me could be unattractive to somebody else). If our chemistry is nothing short of excellent, and we're satisfied with each other mentally or sexually, I'd have to stick with that as opposed to just the outside looks.

[etcj]

Beauty and sexual talents have no correlation at all. Particularly when it comes to oral sex, looks have little to do with how well they can do the deed. If it's just a sexual thing, then I don't think looks really matter. Like other folks, bad sex means that it's time to find a new person.

[Tao]

beauty.....you can always train them.....

"when i get that feelin i want sexual healing"

[Napoleon Chynamite]

I'd choose beauty.

Besides, half the time guys view the best thing about sex is not the sex itself, but the actual process of bragging about it to all your friends afterwards. From a purely superficial level, a stunning girl would impress much more than one who is average but performs well, at least from the point of view of your buddies.

[stunninglyAsian]

I'd choose sex.

As long as you're enjoying the sex, who cares what your friends say? I don't have sex to impress friends. You're friends may rip on you for being with a less than attractive girl, but they'd do the same thing.

And you can't "train" a pretty girl because she thinks she's God's perfect gift to mankind, she truly believes that her beauty can solve the Israeli-Palestian conflict, that all she has to do is stand at the border in her club outfit and people will lay down their arms, hold hands, and sing a song of peace while doves fly above with olive branches in their beaks.

[mr. x]

tsk tsk, whichever u vote for theres something shallow about your choice u know? i mean having bragging rights or a dog who knows good tricks...

what u should want is a girl u find beautiful (regardless of what People magazine think) who's fantastic in bed, and u could care less what people think about u two together

[teaz0r]

sex. the lights can be turned off.
unless he's quasimoto. then i'll
go for the looker.

[Napoleon Chynamite]

Originally Posted by teaz0r

sex. the lights can be turned off.
unless he's quasimoto. then i'll
go for the looker.

Quasimodo was cute. At least that's what my friends thought in the Disney version.