PDA

View Full Version : Cheating using modern technology


lethal
02-03-2003, 12:06 PM
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?...1631EST0742.DTL (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2003/01/30/national1631EST0742.DTL)

University of Maryland students admit to using cell phones to cheat

Six University of Maryland students have admitted cheating on an accounting exam by using their cell phones to receive text messages with the answers, the school said Thursday. Another six students were implicated in the case.

The scheme worked this way: Test-takers brought their cell phones into the exam with them. They used the phones to contact friends outside the classroom. The friends looked up the exam answer key that had been posted on the Internet by the professor once the test had started. Then the friends messaged the answers back to the test-takers.

Officials with the university business school said they caught the students in a sting: A fake answer key with bogus answers was posted online after the exam began last month; then the exams were checked to see which test-takers put down the bogus answers.

It appears most of the 12 students hatched the plan independently of each other, said John Zacker, head of the university's office of judicial programs. He said it was the biggest cheating scheme uncovered on campus involving cell phones.

"We've had isolated cases in past semesters, but not in these numbers," he said.

The case highlights the struggle schools face as they try to keep up with technologically savvy students. Hitotsubashi University in Japan failed 26 students in December for receiving e-mailed exam answers on their cell phones.

The scope of the Maryland case is unprecedented nationally, said Diane Waryold, executive director of Duke University's Center for Academic Integrity. It is also a sign that students might have a technological edge on their older professors, she said.

"It's a generational issue," she said. "It's safe to say our students are far more sophisticated."

The six Maryland students who confessed will fail the class and have a mark placed on their transcript that indicates they cheated. Five others either met with school officials or are awaiting trial by the school's student honor council.

The 12th student died over the winter break. Zacker did not know the circumstances surrounding the death and would not release the student's name.

The council is also looking for the people who sent the text messages to exam-takers, Zacker said.

Provost William Destler sent a letter to faculty members over the weekend recommending they not post answer keys while an exam is ongoing. The school has no plans to bar students from bringing cell phones to class, Zacker said.

The number of Maryland students caught cheating has risen recently, from 97 cases in the fall semester of 2001 to 156 cases in the fall semester of 2002, Zacker said.

The use of cell phones is a new twist. Many phones allow text messages to be passed back and forth silently. The accounting exam was monitored by proctors walking the aisles who failed to notice the cheating.

AliBabaIncorporated
02-03-2003, 12:18 PM
Originally posted by lethalweapon@Feb 3 2003, 03:06 PM
Provost William Destler sent a letter to faculty members over the weekend recommending they not post answer keys while an exam is ongoing.
ddduuuuuuhhhhhh ... okay so you're a university professor technologically savvy enough to know how to upload stuff to a website. Your problem is not that you didn't think of cellphones. Your problem is your complete lack of common sense. Seriously this doesn't even require high technology to cheat, you could just sit in your room until the exam starts, download the answer key, remember as much as possible, and then go run to the exam and claim you woke up late or got caught in traffic.

There's a blatantly obvious cost to putting an exam key online during the exam. And what the hell is the use? Cost-benefit analysis, anyone? I would think an accounting professor would understand this concept. What possible benefit do you get out of this, as opposed to say setting it up to upload during the exam and then, when the last guy hands in his paper, pressing "upload," waiting all of 30 seconds, turning off the computer, and leaving the exam room.

AngryABCGirl
02-03-2003, 11:43 PM
Originally posted by AliBabaIncorporated@Feb 3 2003, 12:18 PM
ddduuuuuuhhhhhh ... okay so you're a university professor technologically savvy enough to know how to upload stuff to a website. Your problem is not that you didn't think of cellphones. Your problem is your complete lack of common sense. Seriously this doesn't even require high technology to cheat, you could just sit in your room until the exam starts, download the answer key, remember as much as possible, and then go run to the exam and claim you woke up late or got caught in traffic.

There's a blatantly obvious cost to putting an exam key online during the exam. And what the hell is the use? Cost-benefit analysis, anyone? I would think an accounting professor would understand this concept. What possible benefit do you get out of this, as opposed to say setting it up to upload during the exam and then, when the last guy hands in his paper, pressing "upload," waiting all of 30 seconds, turning off the computer, and leaving the exam room.
Ditto. Sometimes it feels like teachers are practically setting us up to cheat, or else they're just out of it.

amietron
02-04-2003, 12:53 PM
No one ever said smart people had common sense.

Azn Retribution
02-05-2003, 10:03 AM
pshh..
me and my friends had wireless links on our TI-86s.


We also downloaded notes and programs into our calcs. :D
It wasn't cheating per se.
It was being resourceful and by being resourceful we were smart after all it wasn't against the rules.
right?
of course. I like that logic.


we kind of ruined it for the next class cause the teacher always caught us playing tetris on our calculators
so they aren't allowed to use the graphing calculators as much anymore.

AltimaGTR
02-05-2003, 12:48 PM
Originally posted by Azn Retribution@Feb 5 2003, 10:03 AM
pshh..
me and my friends had wireless links on our TI-86s.


We also downloaded notes and programs into our calcs. :D
It wasn't cheating per se.
It was being resourceful and by being resourceful we were smart after all it wasn't against the rules.
right?
of course. I like that logic.


we kind of ruined it for the next class cause the teacher always caught us playing tetris on our calculators
so they aren't allowed to use the graphing calculators as much anymore.
daym, that's a good idea! And the policy varies from teacher to teacher on whether or not graphing calcs are allowed...

nudel
02-05-2003, 01:15 PM
so they caught some cheaters. but sounds like these business profs are guilty of entrapment. isn't there some sort of law against this. if this was a business class then they just learned a real life lesson. take every opportunity to get ahead even if its a bit grey. but failed at trying to cover their ass. never copy word for word or letter by letter for multi guess. throw in some wrong answers to make it authentic.

Napoleon Chynamite
02-05-2003, 01:39 PM
Who needs technology? Just buy a crapload of M&M's before class starts and then sit next to each other. Make a code so that you know that if you see your friend eat a green one, the answer is A, red, the answer is B, and so forth. Of course, this method is one-sided and banking on the fact that one of you is very smart and/or ready for the exam and the other one is a complete dumbass. Thus, didn't work too well with me and my friends because none of us were ready and/or we were all dumbasses.

lethal
02-05-2003, 06:44 PM
Originally posted by nudel@Feb 5 2003, 04:15 PM
so they caught some cheaters. but sounds like these business profs are guilty of entrapment. isn't there some sort of law against this. if this was a business class then they just learned a real life lesson. take every opportunity to get ahead even if its a bit grey. but failed at trying to cover their ass. never copy word for word or letter by letter for multi guess. throw in some wrong answers to make it authentic.
Entrapment can only be committed by a law enforcement officer...police, FBI, DEA, etc...plus, entrapment is only a defense against criminal prosecutions, not school honor violations, etc...

Aside from that, even if this were a criminal prosecution and the professor was a police officer, it wouldn't be entrapment because the students were predisposed to cheat, regardless of police behavior.