sandra
01-15-2003, 12:28 AM
re: anna guo's case
this has been my opinion since day one and i will hold on to it: one should only enter the legal profession because he is interested in the pursuit of justice. to become an attorney because of the money, because you "like to argue", or for any other bullshit reason would make you a sorry excuse for a lawyer.
i think i've been very good about not showing my bitterness from working on this case. in the past two weeks, i have been searching for an appellate attorney to work on anna's appeal on a pro bono basis. i've been speaking primarily with prominent judges and attorneys in the criminal defense community. unfortunately, they are all friends and acquaintances of mine. and if you know me, you would know that i don't like to ask favors of people - especially a big favor like this one.
but now i'm angry that i'm made to feel this way. why have i, and really, just one other person, become anna's only advocates? why haven't any attorneys contacted me to volunteer their services? every single attorney i've talked to has heard about this case - and all think that the judge's ruling is bizarre. so what's stopping them from fighting for justice on anna's behalf?
maybe i'm just a student and i don't understand time constraints, but i've got 5 classes, been staying up til 3 doing reading because i'm lucky enough this semester to get all professors that use the socratic method, work 19 hours a week at a civil rights litigation firm, am editor of the bar association's newsletter, and will be preparing for the bar in a few months. but tomorrow, i will be meeting with a professor at usc - all former appellate/defense counsels - to ask them to take on anna's case - and if that happens, there's a good chance that i'll be working with them on it. voila, what's left of my weekends will be gone.
i know that i don't *have* to help with the case. and since i have made it my choice to help, i shouldn't be complaining. but the only reason why i'm continuing with this is because i'm not about to let an innocent child get convicted and then lost in the system. and my question to the attorneys out there is this: are you?
i really don't think my anger stems from self-righteousness. i've had different attorneys tell me that anna is "lucky to have me", but i don't want to be the one doing this. i have other things to do. i have other things i want to do. i'm only doing this because it seems like nobody else is willing to step in.
this is just a rant and i'm not blaming anyone in particular. i know that some attorneys really do have many trials scheduled and some cannot afford to take on a big case like this for free. but all we need is just *one* experienced attorney who is willing to.
or maybe i *am* crazy for caring so much?
this has been my opinion since day one and i will hold on to it: one should only enter the legal profession because he is interested in the pursuit of justice. to become an attorney because of the money, because you "like to argue", or for any other bullshit reason would make you a sorry excuse for a lawyer.
i think i've been very good about not showing my bitterness from working on this case. in the past two weeks, i have been searching for an appellate attorney to work on anna's appeal on a pro bono basis. i've been speaking primarily with prominent judges and attorneys in the criminal defense community. unfortunately, they are all friends and acquaintances of mine. and if you know me, you would know that i don't like to ask favors of people - especially a big favor like this one.
but now i'm angry that i'm made to feel this way. why have i, and really, just one other person, become anna's only advocates? why haven't any attorneys contacted me to volunteer their services? every single attorney i've talked to has heard about this case - and all think that the judge's ruling is bizarre. so what's stopping them from fighting for justice on anna's behalf?
maybe i'm just a student and i don't understand time constraints, but i've got 5 classes, been staying up til 3 doing reading because i'm lucky enough this semester to get all professors that use the socratic method, work 19 hours a week at a civil rights litigation firm, am editor of the bar association's newsletter, and will be preparing for the bar in a few months. but tomorrow, i will be meeting with a professor at usc - all former appellate/defense counsels - to ask them to take on anna's case - and if that happens, there's a good chance that i'll be working with them on it. voila, what's left of my weekends will be gone.
i know that i don't *have* to help with the case. and since i have made it my choice to help, i shouldn't be complaining. but the only reason why i'm continuing with this is because i'm not about to let an innocent child get convicted and then lost in the system. and my question to the attorneys out there is this: are you?
i really don't think my anger stems from self-righteousness. i've had different attorneys tell me that anna is "lucky to have me", but i don't want to be the one doing this. i have other things to do. i have other things i want to do. i'm only doing this because it seems like nobody else is willing to step in.
this is just a rant and i'm not blaming anyone in particular. i know that some attorneys really do have many trials scheduled and some cannot afford to take on a big case like this for free. but all we need is just *one* experienced attorney who is willing to.
or maybe i *am* crazy for caring so much?