PDA

View Full Version : Fight Against the CLEAR Act


sandra
03-05-2006, 11:00 AM
This email is being sent to advocates working against legislation that would make state and local police into immigration agents.

As you may know, the Senate is poised to take up an immigration reform bill. The starting proposal is a conglomeration of ideas from various immigration bills already introduced, and was drafted by Senate Judiciary Chairman Arlen Specter (R-PA).

The bill as drafted includes many of the outrageous provisions that passed the House as part of the Sensenbrenner-King bill (HR 4437). Fortunately, the CLEAR Act provisions that passed as part of HR 4437 were not included in the Senate draft.

However, it is apparent that proponents of legislation like the CLEAR Act will be looking for ways to attach it to the bill that is moving. Also, provisions in the Specter draft do make “unlawful presence” a crime and “entry without inspection” an ongoing criminal offense, opening up the back door to local enforcement of immigration laws, if not the front door.

We need your help to strip these and other egregious “enforcement” proposals from the bill, and to stop the more expansive provisions in the CLEAR Act from becoming added!

Please contact your senators now and let them know how you feel. Also, now is the time to gather letters, petitions, resolutions, quotes, et cetera from law enforcement, state and local government, and crime prevention allies. Send these to your senators with a copy to your House representatives – and Lynn at the National Immigration Forum, if you don’t mind (ltramonte@immigrationforum.org). Just as in the last Congress, these letters and calls will be key to stopping this legislation from advancing.

As one member of Congress said before, it’s hard to imagine a “pro-enforcement” bill that is opposed by law enforcement! Problem is, this legislation would actually undermine public safety and community policing, by making immigrants less likely to report crimes or information.

See our new web page on this topic (http://www.immigrationforum.org/DesktopDefault.aspx?tabid=737) for more information, including a summary of the Senate version of CLEAR, which is called the Homeland Security Enhancement Act.

For more on what was included in the Specter bill, see below.


Please act now!

LaiSteve66
03-05-2006, 11:26 AM
Let's see. We give illegals drivers licenses, subsidized tuition and we need them to report crimes.

Why don't we just abolish this "illegal" status that "illegal immigrants" have, get rid of border patrol and the INS and save a bunch of money!

jamixen
03-07-2006, 10:30 AM
Thanks! I'm doing a Conference in Binghamton, NY called the Asian Migrations Conference. This is great information. I think I heard about the Act also enforcing imprisonment for so-called illegals. That's just wrong! Technically, anyone coming undocumented who was refused entry to the U.S. in the first place is illegal. With the system designed the way it is, who wouldn't be considered an illegal?

Faithless
05-01-2006, 10:41 PM
Good to see Kasia so up on the issues, here.

Been trying to find La Raza web sites that are comprehensive on the issues. I think I found one: http://www.nclr.org/

On the subject of CLEAR: http://www.nclr.org/content/policy/detail/1063/

NCLR Position

NCLR strongly opposes the CLEAR Act and all other efforts to make state and local police responsible for the enforcement of federal immigration laws. State and local law enforcement agencies should not enforce federal immigration laws, and these bills would be detrimental to the Latino community. They would erode the relationship between immigrant communities and law enforcement officers, would mean that fewer people report crimes, and would take scarce resources away from other police functions, leaving entire communities less safe. This type of legislation would also likely result in increased racial profiling and civil rights violations by state and local police officers.