PDA

View Full Version : Bush's Stage Crafted Image


myself808
05-16-2003, 05:57 PM
from the New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/16/politics/16IMAG.html?th) (annoying registration required)

Keepers of Bush Image Lift Stagecraft to New Heights
By ELISABETH BUMILLER

WASHINGTON, May 15 — George W. Bush's "Top Gun" landing on the deck of the carrier Abraham Lincoln will be remembered as one of the most audacious moments of presidential theater in American history. But it was only the latest example of how the Bush administration, going far beyond the foundations in stagecraft set by the Reagan White House, is using the powers of television and technology to promote a presidency like never before.
Officials of past Democratic and Republican administrations marvel at how the White House does not seem to miss an opportunity to showcase Mr. Bush in dramatic and perfectly lighted settings. It is all by design: the White House has stocked its communications operation with people from network television who have expertise in lighting, camera angles and the importance of backdrops.
On Tuesday, at a speech promoting his economic plan in Indianapolis, White House aides went so far as to ask people in the crowd behind Mr. Bush to take off their ties, WISH-TV in Indianapolis reported, so they would look more like the ordinary folk the president said would benefit from his tax cut.

snip...

The White House efforts have been ambitious — and costly. For the prime-time television address that Mr. Bush delivered to the nation on the anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks, the White House rented three barges of giant Musco lights, the kind used to illuminate sports stadiums and rock concerts, sent them across New York Harbor, tethered them in the water around the base of the Statue of Liberty and then blasted them upward to illuminate all 305 feet of America's symbol of freedom. It was the ultimate patriotic backdrop for Mr. Bush, who spoke from Ellis Island.
For a speech that Mr. Bush delivered last summer at Mount Rushmore, the White House positioned the best platform for television crews off to one side, not head on as other White Houses have done, so that the cameras caught Mr. Bush in profile, his face perfectly aligned with the four presidents carved in stone.
And on Monday, for remarks the president made promoting his tax cut plan near Albuquerque, the White House unfurled a backdrop that proclaimed its message of the day, "Helping Small Business," over and over. The type was too small to be read by most in the audience, but just the right size for television viewers at home.

snip...

The most elaborate — and criticized — White House event so far was Mr. Bush's speech aboard the Abraham Lincoln announcing the end of major combat in Iraq. White House officials say that a variety of people, including the president, came up with the idea, and that Mr. Sforza embedded himself on the carrier to make preparations days before Mr. Bush's landing in a flight suit and his early evening speech.
Media strategists noted afterward that Mr. Sforza and his aides had choreographed every aspect of the event, even down to the members of the Lincoln crew arrayed in coordinated shirt colors over Mr. Bush's right shoulder and the "Mission Accomplished" banner placed to perfectly capture the president and the celebratory two words in a single shot. The speech was specifically timed for what image makers call "magic hour light," which cast a golden glow on Mr. Bush.
"If you looked at the TV picture, you saw there was flattering light on his left cheek and slight shadowing on his right," Mr. King said. "It looked great."
The trip was attacked by Democrats as an expensive political stunt, but White House officials said that Democrats needed a better issue for taking on the president. A New York Times/CBS News nationwide poll conducted May 9-12 found that the White House may have been right: 59 percent of those polled said it was appropriate, and not an effort to make political gain, for Mr. Bush to dress in a flight suit and announce the end of combat operations on the aircraft carrier.
But even this White House makes mistakes. One of the more notable ones occurred in January, when Mr. Bush delivered a speech about his economic plan at a St. Louis trucking company. Volunteers for the White House covered "Made in China" stamps with white stickers on boxes arrayed on either side of the president. Behind Mr. Bush was a printed backdrop of faux boxes that read "Made in U.S.A.," the message the administration wanted to convey to the television audience.

Question: What do you think of this kind of *staging*, and is it just me or is there a barely detectible shifting in the tone of the press, toward a more skeptical tone regarding Bush's policies and proclomations?

rakovlam
05-16-2003, 06:51 PM
Democrats accuse George W. Bush of being a politician. Good luck on that one...

myself808
05-16-2003, 07:20 PM
I do think that W has been given a pass by the media on things that past administrations have been called out for

Shuriken
05-16-2003, 08:13 PM
Photo-ops are one of the perks of political office, and even though I don't like GWB's grandstanding, I can't hold it against him. But it seems to me that his theatricality has become more brazen because he knows that the press will give him a pass on it, at least initially. As far as I could tell, criticism of Bush's Abraham Lincoln stunt didn't reach the news until days later — mostly through reporting of Robert Byrd's remarks. (The fact that Bush adopted the posture of a fighter pilot when he actually avoided military service in the Texas National Guard due to his father's political connections, and then had an egregious absentee record, seems especially hypocritical.) I get the idea that if a Democratic president had tried a comparable stunt, criticism of the photo-op would have been included in the day-one reporting, not days later.

Tao
05-16-2003, 08:43 PM
i'm not too fond of W, but the white house is right in saying that the dems need a more legitimate issue to complain about. I mean, making a big deal outta this will make them look like a bunch of whiny school kids with no broad minded plans.

mr. x
05-16-2003, 08:46 PM
dude bush has a stage image? i duno, to me he's always that "special" student at the school who gives speeches that no one dares criticize but its so labored....

tvbdude
05-16-2003, 09:01 PM
I don't really care about that stuff.

rakovlam
05-16-2003, 09:24 PM
The fact that Bush adopted the posture of a fighter pilot when he actually avoided military service in the Texas National Guard due to his father's political connections, and then had an egregious absentee record, seems especially hypocritical

http://pro.corbis.com/images/watermark/67/13854939/0000284023-009.jpg

http://pro.corbis.com/images/watermark/67/13854935/0000284023-001.jpg

http://pro.corbis.com/images/watermark/67/13855686/0000284023-005.jpg

Have you seen these pictures of your boy? I certainly didn't back then. Guess what HE did during the Vietnam War?

Shuriken
05-17-2003, 04:17 PM
Originally posted by rakovlam@May 17 2003, 04:24 AM
Have you seen these pictures of your boy? I certainly didn't back then. Guess what HE did during the Vietnam War?
Did Clinton — at extra cost to the taxpayers — make a tailhook landing from a fighter jet onto a carrier that he could have more easily reached by helicopter?

myself808
05-18-2003, 03:01 AM
The issue I was trying to raise is not Dem. vs. Rep. , it's about the media, and wether or not their coverage has been "fair and balanced" as it should be? Isn't journalism supposed to be who, what, where, when, why, how? , ya know, just the facts ma'am.

Tao
05-18-2003, 11:00 AM
Originally posted by myself808@May 18 2003, 06:01 AM
The issue I was trying to raise is not Dem. vs. Rep. , it's about the media, and wether or not their coverage has been "fair and balanced" as it should be? Isn't journalism supposed to be who, what, where, when, why, how? , ya know, just the facts ma'am.
Nope, the news media depend on rating, so more opinionated broadcasting is needed to attract audiences.

AngryABCGirl
05-18-2003, 11:26 AM
Originally posted by Tao@May 18 2003, 10:00 AM
Nope, the news media depend on rating, so more opinionated broadcasting is needed to attract audiences.
Yeah, American media has fallen because once independent newspaper and etc. have been bought over by commercial companies like MSNBC and have been taken over by people who think business rather than people who think news.

etcj
05-18-2003, 07:14 PM
One of my professors had commented that Bush is perhaps one of the worst presidents when it comes to public speaking. He has a lot of trouble in keeping his facial expressions in check - you can always catch him making some goofy face that newspapers snap photos of all the time. If you want to be remembered as a slighlty more comptent president, then you got to stop making yourself look an idiot oncamera.

Emperor_Mike
05-18-2003, 07:39 PM
All politicians have a stage crafted image. As most of us already know it's all part of the game. The masses live for spectacles like grand entrances, exits, and the like. Humans are emotional animals and good politicians learn how to harness a crowd with actions, images, and words that bind everyone to whatever is being promoted at that particular time. How else do you think people like Hilter and Mussolini rose to power? They knew how to manipulate the average Joe/Josephine and successful modern day politicians are no different.