PDA

View Full Version : NOW- Kennedy, the greatest betrayal


haplesshobo
01-28-2008, 05:03 PM
http://www.nownys.org/pr_2008/pr_012808.html


Women have just experienced the ultimate betrayal. Senator Kennedy’s endorsement of Hillary Clinton’s opponent in the Democratic presidential primary campaign has really hit women hard. Women have forgiven Kennedy, stuck up for him, stood by him, hushed the fact that he was late in his support of Title IX, the ERA, and the Family and Medical Leave Act to name a few. Women have buried their anger that his support for the compromises in No Child Left Behind and the Medicare bogus drug benefit brought us the passage of these flawed bills. We have thanked him for his ardent support of many civil rights bills, BUT women are always waiting in the wings.

And now the greatest betrayal! We are repaid with his abandonment! He’s picked the new guy over us. He’s joined the list of progressive white men who can’t or won’t handle the prospect of a woman president who is Hillary Clinton (they will of course say they support a woman president, just not “this” one). “They” are Howard Dean and Jim Dean (Yup! That’s Howard’s brother) who run DFA (that’s the group and list from the Dean campaign that we women helped start and grow). "They" are Alternet, Progressive Democrats of America, democrats.com, Kucinich lovers and all the other groups that take women's money, say they’ll do feminist and women’s rights issues one of these days, and conveniently forget to mention women and children when they talk about poverty or human needs or America’s future.

This latest move by Kennedy, is so telling about the status of and respect for women’s rights, women’s voices, women’s equality, women’s authority and our ability – indeed, our obligation- to promote and earn and deserve and elect, unabashedly, a President that is the first woman after centuries of men who “know what’s best for us.

Yeahman
01-28-2008, 05:20 PM
What a bunch of cry babies. With women like that lobbying politicians, I'm surprised Congress isn't overtly anti-women.

SunWuKong
01-28-2008, 05:26 PM
http://www.nownys.org/pr_2008/pr_012808.html

that reminds me of the blog posts crying over how the black candidate is being attacked. both are equally annoying.

Zdrav
01-28-2008, 06:02 PM
A lot of people don't hate Hillary because she's a woman; they hate her because she's an uncharismatic and unprincipled divider. I'm sure there are some sexists out there, but Ted Kennedy is not one of them.

AngryABCGirl
01-28-2008, 09:21 PM
NOW is one of the most annoying organizations out there.

mr. x
01-28-2008, 11:32 PM
Oh please, Hillary Clinton, if elected is not going to be the WOMAN president. She's going to drop a fucking bomb on Iran just to show she wears the pants

AngryABCGirl
01-29-2008, 01:16 AM
Just because she's a woman is no reason to support her to. I'd rather have the first woman president be someone more worthy and not depending on her husband to help her get elected.

SunWuKong
01-29-2008, 08:10 AM
so here's a question, who does everybody think would make a worthy woman president?

Yeahman
01-29-2008, 09:17 AM
I think Condolezza would have had a good shot at the Republican nomination. Not that she would've made a good president. Hell, there aren't too many worthy men for the position either.

SunWuKong
01-29-2008, 10:07 AM
Hell, there aren't too many worthy men for the position either.

yeah good point.

kimpossible
01-29-2008, 12:20 PM
Isn't Pelosi already third in line?

SunWuKong
01-29-2008, 12:44 PM
Isn't Pelosi already third in line?

isn't she even further to the left than Clinton and Edwards? for some reason that's the impression i have. also some analyst at NBC last night said that the Kansas governor Kathleen Sebelius (who gave the Democrat response to the State of the Union) is on a short list for the vice president seat.