sageb1
12-17-2007, 04:52 PM
It appears that modern Japanese are mostly homegrown, owing their ancestry mainly to Ryukuran sources, thus making Japanese ancestry 25 percent Ryukuran, 24 percent South Chinese, 23 percent Korean and 28 percent Ainu and Tungusic.
This makes me wonder if the 47 percent of Chinese and Korean genotypes account for the reason why the other 53 percent is ignored or overlooked.
That 53 percent consists of South Chinese and Mongolic/Tungusic influences, where Ryukuru was a vassal state of China and nominally civilized. Originally it was a patriarchy using a shamaness religion to control the people with a loose male-dominated leadership that eventually coalesced into a "kingdom" consisting of a nominal heritary leader descended from the original leader who conquered other fiefdoms. Archaeology appears to show that the roots of Okinawa are in Formosa.
As well, the 53 percent of genotypes of Ryukuran and Ainu & Tungusic origin implies that some Japanse should be supportive of Formosan natives, Hawaiian rights to regain Hawaii as their sovereign nations, and spend more tourist dollars visiting Navaho Nation (which they are doing now).
Thus this implies that Taiwanese native culture tours, Hawaiian tours and Navaho Nation tours should be three of the biggest tours for Japanese tourists to buy into.
And, this is true, though I do not know if the tour guides are adding any research statistics to their talks when they go to these destinations.
As well, tour guides are most likely to be politically correct, and avoid enlightening the Japanese tourists about how closely related they are to Formosan aboriginals, Hawaiians and the Dene.
This makes me wonder if the 47 percent of Chinese and Korean genotypes account for the reason why the other 53 percent is ignored or overlooked.
That 53 percent consists of South Chinese and Mongolic/Tungusic influences, where Ryukuru was a vassal state of China and nominally civilized. Originally it was a patriarchy using a shamaness religion to control the people with a loose male-dominated leadership that eventually coalesced into a "kingdom" consisting of a nominal heritary leader descended from the original leader who conquered other fiefdoms. Archaeology appears to show that the roots of Okinawa are in Formosa.
As well, the 53 percent of genotypes of Ryukuran and Ainu & Tungusic origin implies that some Japanse should be supportive of Formosan natives, Hawaiian rights to regain Hawaii as their sovereign nations, and spend more tourist dollars visiting Navaho Nation (which they are doing now).
Thus this implies that Taiwanese native culture tours, Hawaiian tours and Navaho Nation tours should be three of the biggest tours for Japanese tourists to buy into.
And, this is true, though I do not know if the tour guides are adding any research statistics to their talks when they go to these destinations.
As well, tour guides are most likely to be politically correct, and avoid enlightening the Japanese tourists about how closely related they are to Formosan aboriginals, Hawaiians and the Dene.