PDA

View Full Version : Commentary: Colleges block black coaches out ... again


AngryABCGirl
11-28-2007, 08:11 AM
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/11/27/roland.martin/index.html

By Roland S. Martin
CNN Contributor

(CNN) -- I was one of the 85,000-plus on hand at Kyle Field in College Station, Texas, the day after Thanksgiving to see my alma mater, Texas A&M, beat our arch-rival, the University of Texas, 38-30.

After that thrilling win, A&M head coach Dennis Franchione tendered his resignation, ending a five-year run that didn't live up to the billing and, especially, his $2 million annual check.

Three days later, Mike Sherman, the offensive coordinator for the Houston Texans and a former Texas A&M assistant coach, was introduced as the new head coach.

But don't think Texas A&M is alone in zeroing in on one candidate in a supposed "national search."

Six hours after resigning from the University of Arkansas after 15 years, Houston Nutt had a new job in the Southeastern Conference as head of Ole Miss. They didn't even bother to announce a search.

What's wrong with this picture? Many of you may say nothing. But for black and other minority coaches in college football, and even the NFL, it's déjà vu: another high-profile head coaching job opens up, and they don't even get a shot to interview for the job.

This continuing exclusion of minority coaches is indicative of Division I-A colleges and universities, which are quick to field black ball players, but on the sidelines, you might as well forget about it.

Of the 119 Division I-A colleges, just six have African-Americans as head coaches. In 2006, it was five; three in 2005; five in 2004; and four in 2003. In 1997, there were eight.

After being unceremoniously dumped by Notre Dame after three years, Tyrone Willingham was hired by the University of Washington. The other black coaches are: Sylvester Croom at Mississippi State (after his alma mater, the University of Alabama, didn't choose him); Turner Gill at the University of Buffalo; Karl Dorrell at UCLA; Randy Shannon at the University of Miami; and Ron Prince at Kansas State.

And when a black head coach does get a shot, you probably can forget it being at a top-tier program or one that is still in relatively good shape.

Even Penn State's Joe Paterno recognized that fact when he advised one of his assistants, Ron Dickerson, not to take the head coaching job at Temple 15 years ago.

"I said, 'Ron, black coaches have got to get good jobs. They can't turn bad jobs around all the time,' " Paterno told AtlanticMirror.com.

But Dickerson didn't listen. He took the job at Temple, a weak football team for years, and now wishes he listened to Joe Pa.

Athletic directors and college presidents will be quick to say that race has nothing to do with it, but the facts are the facts, and race has to be examined when it's this obvious.

Take the case of Norm Chow.

As offensive coordinator for the University of Southern California, he was the mastermind of an explosive team that won back-to-back national championships in four years featuring two Heisman Trophy winners. When he worked at Brigham Young in the 1970s, he tutored future NFL quarterbacks such Jim McMahon, Ty Detmer and future pro football Hall of Famer Steve Young. But when it came time to fill head coaching jobs in college, Chow's phone barely rang. Now he is the offensive coordinator for the Tennessee Titans, and he still doesn't get a nibble.

Did I mention that Chow is Asian-American?

The NFL finally decided to do something about this problem (after it was threatened with a lawsuit by Johnnie Cochran and other attorneys) when it adopted "The Rooney Rule" in 2002, which mandates that each team considering head coaches interview at least one minority candidate. Today, there are six black head coaches in the NFL: Tony Dungy of the Indianapolis Colts; Lovie Smith, Chicago Bears; Romeo Crennell, Cleveland Browns; Marvin Lewis, Cincinnati Bengals; Herm Edwards, Kansas City Chiefs; and Mike Tomlin, Pittsburgh Steelers. That's down one from when Dennis Green led the Arizona Cardinals and Art Shell directed the Oakland Raiders. (Tomlin is in his first year.)

That means that 32 NFL teams have the same number of black coaches as 119 Division I-A programs.

The university athletic directors and college presidents will be quick to say that race has nothing to do with it and that they look for the most qualified person. But we know that not to be the case.

Other barriers exist.

For instance, Texas A&M athletic director Bill Byrne made it clear that he wanted someone with previous head coaching experience. Fine. But because black coaches have been excluded for years, so few have gotten a shot at top assistant jobs on the college and pro levels, which has kept them from becoming head coaches. So by making such a statement, he effectively eliminated nearly every black coach from consideration. And if that is the stipulation by every other AD or college president, we will never see more coaches because so few get the shot in college and the NFL.

Bottom line: the process if flawed and is inherently unfair.

On the football field, if you ran faster, can throw it farther, are more accurate and can hit harder, you get the starting job. That's called an equal playing field. But on the sidelines, the good ol' boys club reigns, and that's a fraternity that keeps many with my skin tone out.

Go right ahead and send me your e-mails complaining about me playing the race card. But you should be asking yourself why universities won't open these "national searches" up to find the best people and allow them to apply. All of them.

Roland S. Martin is a nationally award-winning journalist and CNN contributor. Martin is studying to receive his master's degree in Christian communications at Louisiana Baptist University, and he is the author of "Listening to the Spirit Within: 50 Perspectives on Faith." You can read more of his columns at www.rolandsmartin.com.

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the writer.

lethal
11-28-2007, 11:30 AM
College coaches have to sell the program to recruits, but almost as important, sell the program to boosters and donors. In the deep South and many other places in this country, it'll take a lot of convincing for a black man or an Asian man to go in front of a bunch of old white men and get them to donate millions of dollars to the football program.

You don't need to do that in the NFL, so that's why they're ahead.

VV o n g B a
11-28-2007, 01:03 PM
College coaches have to sell the program to recruits, but almost as important, sell the program to boosters and donors. In the deep South and many other places in this country, it'll take a lot of convincing for a black man or an Asian man to go in front of a bunch of old white men and get them to donate millions of dollars to the football program.well, sylvester croom is doing that in miss state. i'd say he'll be able to keep his job for at least a little while b/c he beat both alabama (which passed him up for a 4 mil saban that went 6-6), auburn, and kentucky this season to finish 7-5. not bad for miss state.

You don't need to do that in the NFL, so that's why they're ahead.the article mentioned that they require nfl teams to interview a minority. if they did that for college, it might look different. i doubt it would happen, but it'd be awesome if arkansas took chow. they have no passing game to speak of which would totally change if chow got a chance there. then we'd see how a pac-10 coach would do in the sec.

haplesshobo
11-28-2007, 02:41 PM
Take the case of Norm Chow.

As offensive coordinator for the University of Southern California, he was the mastermind of an explosive team that won back-to-back national championships in four years featuring two Heisman Trophy winners. When he worked at Brigham Young in the 1970s, he tutored future NFL quarterbacks such Jim McMahon, Ty Detmer and future pro football Hall of Famer Steve Young. But when it came time to fill head coaching jobs in college, Chow's phone barely rang. Now he is the offensive coordinator for the Tennessee Titans, and he still doesn't get a nibble.



Norm Chow has had his oppurtunities where he was offered HC college jobs but he has rejected them. No one is questioning that he's probably the best OC in college, but that doesn't necessairly mean he'll be a succesfull head coach. There are some concerns about his ability to recruit or how he would deal with booosters.

If Chow had been willing to take those HC jobs, he could have answered those critics and then been on everybody's list for the next HC opening. Or, Chow could have stepped up and played a bigger role in recruiting when he was still the OC in college. For example, I have some concerns about UCLA's DC but I also know he plays a large role in recruiting so that wouldn't be an issue.

lethal
11-28-2007, 04:22 PM
the article mentioned that they require nfl teams to interview a minority. if they did that for college, it might look different. i doubt it would happen, but it'd be awesome if arkansas took chow. they have no passing game to speak of which would totally change if chow got a chance there. then we'd see how a pac-10 coach would do in the sec.

Norm Chow was offered the Kentucky job that Rich Brooks eventually took and did well with. You want a Pac-10 offense in the SEC? You already got one.

lethal
11-28-2007, 04:23 PM
well, sylvester croom is doing that in miss state. i'd say he'll be able to keep his job for at least a little while b/c he beat both alabama (which passed him up for a 4 mil saban that went 6-6), auburn, and kentucky this season to finish 7-5. not bad for miss state.

Up until this year, Croom was dreadful at Miss. State and his job was on the line going into the season.

VV o n g B a
11-28-2007, 04:55 PM
Norm Chow was offered the Kentucky job that Rich Brooks eventually took and did well with. You want a Pac-10 offense in the SEC? You already got one.woops, didn't notice that.

VV o n g B a
11-28-2007, 05:13 PM
Up until this year, Croom was dreadful at Miss. State and his job was on the line going into the season.i suppose thats true, but he's only been there 3 yrs so this is the first year that he's had a lot of his own recruits. miss state hasn't been to a bowl since 2000 so they were sucking long before he got there.

haplesshobo
11-30-2007, 01:16 AM
For instance, Texas A&M athletic director Bill Byrne made it clear that he wanted someone with previous head coaching experience.[/QUOTE]

Oh neaux, a college AD wants somebody with head coaching experience. :rolleyes:

Maybe, I'm just jaded, but after the Dorrell experience at UCLA, why would a major program want to take a chance like that unless we're talking about a super assistant coach like Stoops? For the first few years, Dorrell got a pass cause he had never been a HC before and needed a chance to grow and learn on the job. But, if you had hired a coach with previous HC experience, you could have avoided those growing pains.


Three days later, Mike Sherman, the offensive coordinator for the Houston Texans and a former Texas A&M assistant coach, was introduced as the new head coach.

But don't think Texas A&M is alone in zeroing in on one candidate in a supposed "national search."

Six hours after resigning from the University of Arkansas after 15 years, Houston Nutt had a new job in the Southeastern Conference as head of Ole Miss. They didn't even bother to announce a search.

What's wrong with this picture? Many of you may say nothing. But for black and other minority coaches in college football, and even the NFL, it's déjà vu: another high-profile head coaching job opens up, and they don't even get a shot to interview for the job.

To make his point, the writer ignores the accomplishments of Nutt and Sherman so as imply that there could have been a better black coaching candidate if only those universities had made an attempt at a coaching search. But, Sherman won three consecutive NFC North Titles in the NFL as well as had ties to A&M and Nutt won three SEC conference titles.

A&M and Miss were aggressive like this because if they didn't move in fast and sign up these coaches, another team could have swooped in and signed up those coaches.

Zdrav
11-30-2007, 02:46 PM
If Charlie Weis (the supposed genius who has made a disgrace of Notre Dame this season) was Black, what would happen to him?

lethal
11-30-2007, 06:40 PM
If Charlie Weis (the supposed genius who has made a disgrace of Notre Dame this season) was Black, what would happen to him?

He would've been Willinghammed.

haplesshobo
11-30-2007, 09:17 PM
If Charlie Weis (the supposed genius who has made a disgrace of Notre Dame this season) was Black, what would happen to him?

Weis has done a really, really bad job this year. First of all, with that 10 year extension, black or white, no school is going to take that financial hit and fire him. And, part of the reason Willingham was fired was that ND thought it could sign Urban Meyer, who had publicly stated that ND was his dream job. This time around, there's nobody ND really covets like they did last time with Meyer.

But, I think its a bit unfair to imply that he would be fired if he had been black. He coached up a ND team that wasn't supposed go anywhere to two BCS bowl games (although ND wouldn't have been selected if it wasn't for the fact that its ND) and he's bringing in the top recruiting class after two top 10 recruiting classes when Willingham had been making excuses about how difficult it was to recruit to ND.

Weis has made a lot of mistakes, in part due to his lack of HC experience. But, I'd be a lot more confident in Weis as the coach than Willingham- Weis is bringing in superior talent and he's shown a willingness to make changes which Willingham hadn't when Willingham refused to fire his assistant coaches.

yoMAMA
11-30-2007, 11:02 PM
is the boosters thing a big deal in the west and east coast?

haplesshobo
12-05-2007, 03:16 PM
well, sylvester croom is doing that in miss state. i'd say he'll be able to keep his job for at least a little while b/c he beat both alabama (which passed him up for a 4 mil saban that went 6-6), auburn, and kentucky this season to finish 7-5. not bad for miss state.


Before this season, he only had won 4 SEC games, with two of those wins getting the other coach eventually fired. Overall, his team won only nine games total while losing twenty-five games.

The elephant in the room that nobody wants to talk about is that college ADs might be reluctant to take a chance and hire a black HC because they know how political and difficult it will be to eventually fire a black coach. Its kind of like the European model, with job security and generous benefits, where companies are relucutant to hire employees because they know they cannot later shed them when business turns sour.

With such a poor record, would Croom have been given another chance this season if he wasn't the first black HC in the SEC and the attention and signfigance that garnered? Sure, Miss State was under probation but so was Alabamaw when Shula took over and Shula was fired even though he went 10-2 one season.

Look at the hit ND took when it dumped Willingham to go after Meyer, and how ND was labeled racist in the media. Weis deservedly is getting ripped a new one for only winning three games this season, but what about Willingham? He only won one more game, and he's gone 11-25 in three seasons. But, Willingham will come back next season even though he's the first Washington coach to have three consecutive losing seasons. Would Washington have dared to keep Willingham, after the uproar it saw ND endure? Did Washington decide that it was just going to have to endure a few more losing seasons cause it didn't want to be labeled racist?

When there was all this talk about getting Dorrell fired, you should have seen what people were saying to defend him. One newspaper article acknowledged how Dorrell's team had been inconsistent and underperformed, but then argued that Dorrell should be retained cause Dorrell was black... That when there was only six black coaches and when there were underrepresentation of black students at UCLA, Dorrell should be kept because he was black. Nothing about whether or not Dorrell was a good coach.

Then, there was Dorrell himself playing the race card and how he threw his alma mater under the bus. UCLA and its fans were labeled racists, and that Dorrell had never played on a level playing field cause he's black.

Zdrav
12-06-2007, 01:03 PM
Weis is bringing in superior talent

How do you know that's only because he's a White guy, and some people may have an idealized image of ND as a lily-white club for the good old boys.

haplesshobo
12-07-2007, 03:07 PM
A&M and Miss were aggressive like this because if they didn't move in fast and sign up these coaches, another team could have swooped in and signed up those coaches.

UCLA's AD is doing the PC thing where he's going through a thorough coaching search and interviewing candidates only after KD got fired. The only problem with this is that by the time you're done with this process is that the coaches you want will have already been signed up by other colleges.

I'm a really big fan of Paul Johnson, and he was the coach I really wanted at UCLA. He's won wherever he's coached up, and used whatever scheme, from the triple option to the spread offense, that would best suit his players. But, now Georgia Tech has already hired Johnson as its coach. You've got to wonder if maybe UCLA had just ditched any pretense of a process for finding a coach and zeroed in on Johnson, if UCLA maybe could have signed Johnson first.

How do you know that's only because he's a White guy, and some people may have an idealized image of ND as a lily-white club for the good old boys.

Um... You could look up how highly rated the recruiting classes were when those coaches signed those players. Willingham's first class was pretty good but there was a fall off after that.

A lot of times, in college football, it comes down to recruiting. That's why a coach like Carroll at SC, who was a mediocre coach in the NFL, can thrive at the college level cause he's recruiting 5 star players.