sageb1
06-04-2007, 07:09 PM
Why? Why?? Why??? 葎焚担?葎焚担??葎焚担???
泌惚義井宀哘乎侃沓�斤凝溢(膿媼宀)哘乎泌採侃尖�
艇�胆忽岑紛恢幡侭嗤宀�嬬音葎送奪凝溢議涙顎資旋佩葎覚毅鱒払宅�
�泌惚艇貧www.google.com利嫋朴沫�鹸崙"胆忽凝溢晒僥巷望" 伊 倖査忖議畠兆娚薮壓"朴沫崇"嶄�祥辛壓貫及1利匈蝕兵議10謹倖利匈坪朴沫欺厘厮将窟燕狛議10謹撃哂猟賜/式嶄猟巷蝕佚。�
If pirates should be punished, how about Du Pont, the robber?
Could you (intellectual property proprietors in U.S.A.) avoid shouldering loss for hoodlum Du Pont's shameful behaviors for profit?
(If you log on www.google.com, copy and paste the 8-Chinese character full name of Du Pont "胆忽凝溢晒僥巷望", you could see more than 10 published English or/and Chinese open letters by me on more than 10 pages from the first one.)
All intellectual property proprietors in U.S., how are you?
Your government sued Chinese government for "not doing its best to fight against piracy" to WTO on April 9, 2007. Chinese government publicly reiterated its resolution to strictly crash piracy, and compensated related companies in your country with several billions USD for their loss. As a result, enterprises involved in piracy were devastatingly struck, but related company in your country still thought Chinese government was not in its best to crash piracy. If now your government still fails to convince or force Du Pont to fulfillits obligations in Agreement 1995, world public may have a series of doubt and concern below. Since Du Pont could 100% publicly possessed by power (exclusive possession) Mr. Huang's patent technology of effective and nontoxic agricultural pesticide, why venders in other countries were accused of violation of law for just selling some piratical disks, which is far from 100% publicly possessing by power the right of production and sales of the disks worldwide? Why could Du Pont distain and trample the law, but venders have to observe all laws? Why must laws be strictly enforced by other country's government? Although other country's government has the intention to strictly enforce the laws and take relevant actions, since Du Pont's behaviors-publicly possession of Mr. Huang's patent by force, refusing to fulfill its commitments in Agreement 1995 to pay patent fee and license fee to Mr. Huang for many years, slandering China "a raffish country", and Mr. Huang "a rascal", writing letter to threaten and intimidate Mr. Huang and bringing false charge against him before Chinese police-did not deserve what they should have, with the feeling of unfairness and negative mentality caused in the public worldwide, would that take the effect of "strictly enforcing the laws" as expected? Whether it would instigate a minority of people to breach your intellectual property as revenge? Whether it will lead to a vicious circle of competitively violating the others' intellectual property? If these doubt and concerns unfortunately come true, would it be an absurd situation in which other intellectual property proprietors in your country should shoulder the loss for Du Pont's unashamed violation of agreement? Then why should trade intellectual property proprietors' legal benefits for illegal benefits of Du Pont and its accomplice? Why?Why??Why??? Is it necessary?
Implementation of a law, regulation or agreement should rely on not only compulsory measures adopted by government, but also, or more important, on conscious abidance of related parties worldwide. To achieve that goal, related law-executing departments must bear "all are equal before the law" in mind during execution process, but must not ignore open and brutal trample of laws, regulations and agreements of one certain member, who is with great power or has special interest relations with the executor. Otherwise, any agreement between governments will become blank before public without any sanction.
Disputes between Mr. Huang and Du Pont comprise of adequate fact evidence and clear legal relations (rights and obligations), namely Du Pont has been fully entitled to the rights regulated in Agreement 1995, now simply carrying out the corresponding obligations will solve all problems. What we are waiting for now is just forced fulfillment of Du Pont of obligations in Agreement 1995 by law-executing departments in your country.
Best wishes!
Universal Agent: SXF 2007-04-15
泌惚義井宀哘乎侃沓�斤凝溢(膿媼宀)哘乎泌採侃尖�
艇�胆忽岑紛恢幡侭嗤宀�嬬音葎送奪凝溢議涙顎資旋佩葎覚毅鱒払宅�
�泌惚艇貧www.google.com利嫋朴沫�鹸崙"胆忽凝溢晒僥巷望" 伊 倖査忖議畠兆娚薮壓"朴沫崇"嶄�祥辛壓貫及1利匈蝕兵議10謹倖利匈坪朴沫欺厘厮将窟燕狛議10謹撃哂猟賜/式嶄猟巷蝕佚。�
恊彰議胆忽岑紛恢幡侭嗤宀�光了挫�
酷忽屓軒厮壓2007定4埖9晩參嶄忽屓軒"嬉似義井音薦"葎喇�WTO戻軟阻盆墨。嶄忽屓軒冢染嬉似義井頁謹肝�畠弊順巷蝕狛議�旺厮卆隈�酷忽嗤購巷望唐灰阻方參 噴叮胆圷柴議鱒払�聞嗤義井試強議二匍鞭欺阻支註來議嬉似�峪頁酷忽嗤購巷望珊範葎"嬉似義井音薦"遇厮�"嬉似義井音薦"�ゞ歌個�連〃 2007.04.11.P8址哈胆選芙鯖腹禽4埖10晩窮�。泌惚�壓酷忽屓軒珊音嬬傍捲賜膿崙胆忽凝溢晒 僥巷望堕佩万壓ゞ1995定亅咏〃嶄侭覚典議吶暦議三�畠弊順俯謹巷巉辛嬬氏恢伏和峰匯狼双夘諒才喃打。屡 隼凝溢辛參巷蝕仇100%�"鏡媼來"�仇膿媼仔枠伏議互丼、涙蕎滴匍恰質廨旋室宝�葎焚担艶忽議弌斌祁沢叱嫖義井高徒�垓垓音頁巷蝕仇100% 仇膿媼阻椎乂高徒壓畠弊順議伏恢、�弁幡�祥離隈椿�葎焚担凝溢辛參衷篇樹未隈舵�椎乂弌斌祁 祥駅倬 "嗤隈駅卆"椿�艶忽屓軒祥駅倬"峇隈駅冢"椿�軸聞艶忽屓軒嗤"峇隈駅冢"議吭垳旺寡函阻"峇隈駅冢"議佩強�徽頁喇噐凝溢巷蝕膿媼仔枠伏議廨旋、謹定栖匯岷詳蒸梓孚万壓ゞ1995定亅咏〃嶄議覚典�仔枠伏屶 原廨旋継才俯辛屬継旺拝郡遇釈隔瑠衷嶄忽�P.R.China�頁匯倖和綬議涙正忽社、仔枠伏頁匯倖和綬議 涙正芸徨、亟佚斤仔枠伏序佩璃于-恐賄、欺嶄忽巷芦字購斤仔枠伏序佩瑠御�墾�誼音欺哘嗤議侃尖�咀緩壓畠弊順巷巉嶄恢伏鞭音峠吉棋囑議湖状 才剃郡伉尖�嬬函誼"峇隈駅冢"議丼惚宅�頁倦封崛郡遇氏爾窟自富方繁烏鹸來仇盃係酷忽議岑紛恢幡椿�宸劔頁倦氏夛撹匯嶽�札昇琵來仇盃係 斤圭岑紛恢幡議具來儉桟椿�泌惚宸乂夘諒嚥喃打音侑撹葎�糞議三�椎音祥撹阻匯嶽凝溢涙顎離埃資旋遇酷忽凪 麿岑紛恢幡侭嗤宀葎凝溢議涙顎離埃資旋佩葎覚毅鱒払議残喋蕉中宅�椎葎焚担勣喘低断宸乂岑紛恢幡侭嗤宀議栽 隈旋吩栖算函凝溢式凪栽脹宀議掲隈旋吩椿�葎焚担?葎焚担??葎焚担???嗤緩駅勣宅�
匯倖隈舵、隈号、亅咏議峇佩�茅阻卆真屓軒議膿崙企仏翌�珊駅倬、封崛厚嶷勣議頁畠弊順�購撹埀議徭状恆便 �遇勣畠弊順�購撹埀徭状恆便��購峇隈何壇壓峇隈扮祥駅恂欺"壓隈舵中念�繁繁峠吉"�遇音嬬咀葎蝶匯撹埀米薦熟寄賜峇隈宀嚥宸匯撹埀嗤蝶嶽蒙歩旋吩購狼祥斤万巷蝕仇、間羽仇樹未隈舵、隈号、 亅咏議佩葎音公嚠侃尖 �喇麿販吭巷蝕仇、間羽仇樹未隈舵、隈号、亅咏�倦夸販採屓軒寂議亅咏壓巷巉中脅載辛嬬叙叙祥 頁匯崕腎猟 �斤巷巉短嗤販採埃崩薦。
仔枠伏嚥凝溢岻寂議樟計,並糞屬象割蛍�隈舵�幡旋才吶暦�購狼苧鳩�軸凝溢厮将頼畠�鞭阻ゞ 1995定亅 咏〃嶄号協議幡旋�峪勣堕佩ゞ1995定亅咏〃嶄号協議吶暦祥匯俳諒籾脅盾畳阻。�壓峪吉棋酷 忽峇隈何壇膿 崙凝溢堕佩ゞ1995定亅咏〃嶄号協議吶暦。
緩崑
恷括互議彰撰�
畠夭旗尖繁�SXF
泌惚義井宀哘乎侃沓�斤凝溢(膿媼宀)哘乎泌採侃尖�
艇�胆忽岑紛恢幡侭嗤宀�嬬音葎送奪凝溢議涙顎資旋佩葎覚毅鱒払宅�
�泌惚艇貧www.google.com利嫋朴沫�鹸崙"胆忽凝溢晒僥巷望" 伊 倖査忖議畠兆娚薮壓"朴沫崇"嶄�祥辛壓貫及1利匈蝕兵議10謹倖利匈坪朴沫欺厘厮将窟燕狛議10謹撃哂猟賜/式嶄猟巷蝕佚。�
If pirates should be punished, how about Du Pont, the robber?
Could you (intellectual property proprietors in U.S.A.) avoid shouldering loss for hoodlum Du Pont's shameful behaviors for profit?
(If you log on www.google.com, copy and paste the 8-Chinese character full name of Du Pont "胆忽凝溢晒僥巷望", you could see more than 10 published English or/and Chinese open letters by me on more than 10 pages from the first one.)
All intellectual property proprietors in U.S., how are you?
Your government sued Chinese government for "not doing its best to fight against piracy" to WTO on April 9, 2007. Chinese government publicly reiterated its resolution to strictly crash piracy, and compensated related companies in your country with several billions USD for their loss. As a result, enterprises involved in piracy were devastatingly struck, but related company in your country still thought Chinese government was not in its best to crash piracy. If now your government still fails to convince or force Du Pont to fulfillits obligations in Agreement 1995, world public may have a series of doubt and concern below. Since Du Pont could 100% publicly possessed by power (exclusive possession) Mr. Huang's patent technology of effective and nontoxic agricultural pesticide, why venders in other countries were accused of violation of law for just selling some piratical disks, which is far from 100% publicly possessing by power the right of production and sales of the disks worldwide? Why could Du Pont distain and trample the law, but venders have to observe all laws? Why must laws be strictly enforced by other country's government? Although other country's government has the intention to strictly enforce the laws and take relevant actions, since Du Pont's behaviors-publicly possession of Mr. Huang's patent by force, refusing to fulfill its commitments in Agreement 1995 to pay patent fee and license fee to Mr. Huang for many years, slandering China "a raffish country", and Mr. Huang "a rascal", writing letter to threaten and intimidate Mr. Huang and bringing false charge against him before Chinese police-did not deserve what they should have, with the feeling of unfairness and negative mentality caused in the public worldwide, would that take the effect of "strictly enforcing the laws" as expected? Whether it would instigate a minority of people to breach your intellectual property as revenge? Whether it will lead to a vicious circle of competitively violating the others' intellectual property? If these doubt and concerns unfortunately come true, would it be an absurd situation in which other intellectual property proprietors in your country should shoulder the loss for Du Pont's unashamed violation of agreement? Then why should trade intellectual property proprietors' legal benefits for illegal benefits of Du Pont and its accomplice? Why?Why??Why??? Is it necessary?
Implementation of a law, regulation or agreement should rely on not only compulsory measures adopted by government, but also, or more important, on conscious abidance of related parties worldwide. To achieve that goal, related law-executing departments must bear "all are equal before the law" in mind during execution process, but must not ignore open and brutal trample of laws, regulations and agreements of one certain member, who is with great power or has special interest relations with the executor. Otherwise, any agreement between governments will become blank before public without any sanction.
Disputes between Mr. Huang and Du Pont comprise of adequate fact evidence and clear legal relations (rights and obligations), namely Du Pont has been fully entitled to the rights regulated in Agreement 1995, now simply carrying out the corresponding obligations will solve all problems. What we are waiting for now is just forced fulfillment of Du Pont of obligations in Agreement 1995 by law-executing departments in your country.
Best wishes!
Universal Agent: SXF 2007-04-15
泌惚義井宀哘乎侃沓�斤凝溢(膿媼宀)哘乎泌採侃尖�
艇�胆忽岑紛恢幡侭嗤宀�嬬音葎送奪凝溢議涙顎資旋佩葎覚毅鱒払宅�
�泌惚艇貧www.google.com利嫋朴沫�鹸崙"胆忽凝溢晒僥巷望" 伊 倖査忖議畠兆娚薮壓"朴沫崇"嶄�祥辛壓貫及1利匈蝕兵議10謹倖利匈坪朴沫欺厘厮将窟燕狛議10謹撃哂猟賜/式嶄猟巷蝕佚。�
恊彰議胆忽岑紛恢幡侭嗤宀�光了挫�
酷忽屓軒厮壓2007定4埖9晩參嶄忽屓軒"嬉似義井音薦"葎喇�WTO戻軟阻盆墨。嶄忽屓軒冢染嬉似義井頁謹肝�畠弊順巷蝕狛議�旺厮卆隈�酷忽嗤購巷望唐灰阻方參 噴叮胆圷柴議鱒払�聞嗤義井試強議二匍鞭欺阻支註來議嬉似�峪頁酷忽嗤購巷望珊範葎"嬉似義井音薦"遇厮�"嬉似義井音薦"�ゞ歌個�連〃 2007.04.11.P8址哈胆選芙鯖腹禽4埖10晩窮�。泌惚�壓酷忽屓軒珊音嬬傍捲賜膿崙胆忽凝溢晒 僥巷望堕佩万壓ゞ1995定亅咏〃嶄侭覚典議吶暦議三�畠弊順俯謹巷巉辛嬬氏恢伏和峰匯狼双夘諒才喃打。屡 隼凝溢辛參巷蝕仇100%�"鏡媼來"�仇膿媼仔枠伏議互丼、涙蕎滴匍恰質廨旋室宝�葎焚担艶忽議弌斌祁沢叱嫖義井高徒�垓垓音頁巷蝕仇100% 仇膿媼阻椎乂高徒壓畠弊順議伏恢、�弁幡�祥離隈椿�葎焚担凝溢辛參衷篇樹未隈舵�椎乂弌斌祁 祥駅倬 "嗤隈駅卆"椿�艶忽屓軒祥駅倬"峇隈駅冢"椿�軸聞艶忽屓軒嗤"峇隈駅冢"議吭垳旺寡函阻"峇隈駅冢"議佩強�徽頁喇噐凝溢巷蝕膿媼仔枠伏議廨旋、謹定栖匯岷詳蒸梓孚万壓ゞ1995定亅咏〃嶄議覚典�仔枠伏屶 原廨旋継才俯辛屬継旺拝郡遇釈隔瑠衷嶄忽�P.R.China�頁匯倖和綬議涙正忽社、仔枠伏頁匯倖和綬議 涙正芸徨、亟佚斤仔枠伏序佩璃于-恐賄、欺嶄忽巷芦字購斤仔枠伏序佩瑠御�墾�誼音欺哘嗤議侃尖�咀緩壓畠弊順巷巉嶄恢伏鞭音峠吉棋囑議湖状 才剃郡伉尖�嬬函誼"峇隈駅冢"議丼惚宅�頁倦封崛郡遇氏爾窟自富方繁烏鹸來仇盃係酷忽議岑紛恢幡椿�宸劔頁倦氏夛撹匯嶽�札昇琵來仇盃係 斤圭岑紛恢幡議具來儉桟椿�泌惚宸乂夘諒嚥喃打音侑撹葎�糞議三�椎音祥撹阻匯嶽凝溢涙顎離埃資旋遇酷忽凪 麿岑紛恢幡侭嗤宀葎凝溢議涙顎離埃資旋佩葎覚毅鱒払議残喋蕉中宅�椎葎焚担勣喘低断宸乂岑紛恢幡侭嗤宀議栽 隈旋吩栖算函凝溢式凪栽脹宀議掲隈旋吩椿�葎焚担?葎焚担??葎焚担???嗤緩駅勣宅�
匯倖隈舵、隈号、亅咏議峇佩�茅阻卆真屓軒議膿崙企仏翌�珊駅倬、封崛厚嶷勣議頁畠弊順�購撹埀議徭状恆便 �遇勣畠弊順�購撹埀徭状恆便��購峇隈何壇壓峇隈扮祥駅恂欺"壓隈舵中念�繁繁峠吉"�遇音嬬咀葎蝶匯撹埀米薦熟寄賜峇隈宀嚥宸匯撹埀嗤蝶嶽蒙歩旋吩購狼祥斤万巷蝕仇、間羽仇樹未隈舵、隈号、 亅咏議佩葎音公嚠侃尖 �喇麿販吭巷蝕仇、間羽仇樹未隈舵、隈号、亅咏�倦夸販採屓軒寂議亅咏壓巷巉中脅載辛嬬叙叙祥 頁匯崕腎猟 �斤巷巉短嗤販採埃崩薦。
仔枠伏嚥凝溢岻寂議樟計,並糞屬象割蛍�隈舵�幡旋才吶暦�購狼苧鳩�軸凝溢厮将頼畠�鞭阻ゞ 1995定亅 咏〃嶄号協議幡旋�峪勣堕佩ゞ1995定亅咏〃嶄号協議吶暦祥匯俳諒籾脅盾畳阻。�壓峪吉棋酷 忽峇隈何壇膿 崙凝溢堕佩ゞ1995定亅咏〃嶄号協議吶暦。
緩崑
恷括互議彰撰�
畠夭旗尖繁�SXF