PDA

View Full Version : U.S. Infrastructure Deteriorating, Report Finds


kpih
03-09-2005, 12:33 PM
U.S. Infrastructure Deteriorating, Report Finds

1 hour, 3 minutes ago

By Alan Elsner

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. roads, bridges, sewers and dams are crumbling and need a $1.6 trillion overhaul but prospects for improvement are grim, the American Society of Civil Engineers said in a report issued on Wednesday.


The group's first report since 2001 looked at 15 categories of public infrastructure, assigning each a letter grade. Overall, the nation's infrastructure received a D, down from a D+ four years ago.


"If we treated our own homes like we treat our infrastructure, we'd all live in shacks," said ASCE president William Henry.


Donald Plusquellic, Democratic mayor of Akron, Ohio, and president of the U.S. Conference of Mayors, blamed a lack of political will over many years compounded by the policy of tax cuts pursued by President Bush (news - web sites).


"I don't know of a single tax cut that's replaced a bridge. When that bridge fails killing people, nobody's going to care whether those people were Republicans or Democrats," he said.


The society estimated the cost of bringing infrastructure to an acceptable level at $1.6 trillion over five years from government and the private sector. The report was compiled by 24 top engineers who analyzed published material and surveyed 2,000 engineers in the field.


The report said that since 2001, the conditions of the country's roads, drinking water system, public transit, wastewater disposal, hazardous waste disposal, navigable waterways and energy system had worsened.


The nation's drinking water system alone needed a public investment of $11 billion a year to replace facilities, comply with regulations and meet future needs. But federal funding reached less than 10 percent of this amount. As a result, aging wastewater systems were discharging billions of gallons of untreated sewage into surface waters each year, the report said.


Poor roads cost U.S. motorists $54 billion a year in repairs and operating costs while Americans spent 3.5 billion hours a year stuck in traffic jams.


The country's power transmission system also needed to be modernized, the report said. While demand continued to rise, transmission capacity failed to keep pace and actually fell by 2 percent in 2001.


As of 2003, 27 percent of the nation's bridges were structurally deficient or obsolete, a slight improvement from 28.5 percent in 2000.


But since 1998, the number of unsafe dams in the country rose by 33 percent to more than 3,500.

rotrab
03-09-2005, 10:25 PM
I read this at work today or similar article.

Isn't it just oh-so-grandly amusing how these reports never seem to come out like BEFORE THE FUCKING ELECTION!?

Banana
03-10-2005, 08:05 AM
Pfft.

Who needs roads when we can use money to build more military weapons?

AliBabaIncorporated
03-10-2005, 08:43 AM
Okay, infrastructure spending where it's needed is all well and good, but ...
U.S. roads, bridges, sewers and dams are crumbling and need a $1.6 trillion overhaul but prospects for improvement are grim, the American Society of Civil Engineers said in a report issued on Wednesday.

I don't think these guys are exactly a disinterested party ... who do you think is gonna get those $1.6 trillion dollars in contracts? The American Medical Assocation? Greenpeace?

rotrab
03-11-2005, 08:55 AM
But if ASCE doesn't speak up about the state of the infrastructure then who should? Are they to remain silent? Then you'd complain about that. So what if they aren't a disinterested party? Fuck, son, they shouldn't be disinterested. Nobody should.

AliBabaIncorporated
03-11-2005, 10:18 AM
But if ASCE doesn't speak up about the state of the infrastructure then who should? Are they to remain silent? Then you'd complain about that.
Why would I complain? I think people shutting the fuck up is a great idea. I wish they'd do it more often.

Anyway, the users of the infrastructure can complain. It's called supply and demand. It's not up to the supplier to say, "hey, I'd like to give you more stuff, and you can pay me for it, regardless of whether you need it or not."

hooligan
03-11-2005, 10:34 AM
Okay, infrastructure spending where it's needed is all well and good, but ...

I don't think these guys are exactly a disinterested party ... who do you think is gonna get those $1.6 trillion dollars in contracts? The American Medical Assocation? Greenpeace?

No way, the war, duh.

Why would I complain? I think people shutting the fuck up is a great idea. I wish they'd do it more often.

haha, the irony.

AliBabaIncorporated
03-11-2005, 11:33 AM
haha, the irony.
Yeah, but you had to ruin it by saying something. Now it's just not as ironic anymore.