PDA

View Full Version : Young voters: swing votes


Faithless
09-20-2004, 03:42 PM
Young voters register heavily in key states: 18- to 24-year-olds are nation's newest swing voters (http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6055341/)
Voter registration drives aimed at young people are turning 18-to 24-year-olds into an important variable in the presidential election, especially in decisive battleground states such as Michigan — where nearly 100,000 young people have registered in recent months — and Wisconsin, where the numbers are even higher.

They are the nation’s newest swing voters, with polls showing their support for the major candidates has vacillated in recent months. A Harvard University poll found that, in a five-month period, 19 percent of young potential voters changed their minds about whom they’d support.

“It’s a big population of fluid voters, and they’re largely unknown,” says Ivan Frishberg, outreach and communications coordinator for the nonprofit New Voters Project, which has registered tens of thousands of young people across the country.

Take Kristin Wilson, a 23-year-old in Perrysburg, Ohio, and her 18-year-old sister, Kellyn, a freshman at Ohio State University. Both have registered to vote, but neither identifies as Republican or Democrat and both are taking their time deciding who to vote for.

“I think people underestimate people our age,” Kellyn says. “And they shouldn’t.”

The candidates have made some attempts to reach out to college students and other young people. The Bush campaign has a Web log that includes “Barbara and Jenna’s journal,” detailing the president’s daughters’ campaign exploits. Democrat John Kerry, who made a campus tour last spring, recently appeared on Comedy Central’s “The Daily Show.”

And the political parties are using volunteers and paid canvassers to register young voters and get them to the polls. But the attempts can sometimes fall flat.

“Some of it feels very awkward to young people — like the candidates are trying too hard,” says Jane Eisner, author of the new book “Taking Back the Vote: Getting American Youth Involved in Our Democracy.”

Other times, young people feel ignored, says Stephen Lucas, a high school junior in Leechburg, Pa.

“I haven’t heard any serious talk about college tuition, or even people our age mentioned,” says Lucas, who works with a group called Freedom’s Answer to get upperclassmen interested in voting.

It’s still anybody’s guess how many young people have registered in his state, another thought to be a toss-up. Michigan is one of the few that has compiled registration numbers by age.

Clear signs in other states
Officials in several other battleground states — New Mexico, Ohio and Florida among them — see clear signs that more young people are interested in this election. And some election experts believe that polls of “likely voters” often miss young people because the population is so mobile.

In Wisconsin, the New Voters Project claims to have registered more than 109,000 young people — numbers election officials say they have “no reason to doubt.”

“It’s been an incredible undertaking,” says Kevin Kennedy, executive director of the State Board of Elections in Wisconsin, a state Al Gore won by less than 6,000 votes in 2000.

Officials at Rock the Vote — a nationwide campaign aimed at young people — say they expect registration numbers to surge as deadlines in many states approach. In the first two weeks of September alone, more than 163,000 people filled out and downloaded registration forms from Rock the Vote’s Web site. Hans Riemer, the organization’s Washington, D.C., director, says that in the past week as many as 20,000 people a day used the site to register.

At that rate, he says Rock the Vote’s registration numbers may surpass those from 1992 — a year when young voter turnout topped 50 percent for the first and only time since 1972.

One political scientist says he’s particularly interested to see what happens this time in Minnesota, New Hampshire and Wisconsin, where voters can register on Election Day. Data has shown that young people are particularly likely to take advantage of same-day registration.

'Door open for a surprising outcome'
“It leaves the door open for a surprising outcome,” says Donald Green, a political scientist at Yale University and co-author of “Get Out the Vote: How to Increase Voter Turnout.”

Stephanie Camargo, a recent graduate of the University of Florida who opted not to vote in 2000, says she’ll be one of those young people who gets to the polls Nov. 2. She has many motivators — from the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and the war in Iraq (where she has a cousin fighting), to peers who are still looking for jobs.

“Before I thought of politics as a game,” says Camargo, 22, who’s registered in Broward County, Fla. “Now I realize you have to play the game if you want to make a difference.”

Faithless
10-15-2004, 05:06 PM
Sorry to post in my own dead thread. Thought it would be better than starting another one. :tongue:

This article talks about the registration effort for the youth vote, and how they're not really counted in the polls, but the fact that there is a large effort to court their vote.

Voter dissatisfaction indicates it won't be close (http://www.oaklandtribune.com/Stories/0,1413,82%257E1751%257E2467097,00.html?search=filt er)
CONVENTIONAL wisdom -- that generally held view, notion or opinion -- suggests this year's presidential election will be close. Practically every poll taken has the race within the margin of error.
At the risk of looking like a fool, I am prepared to respect-

fully disagree with conventional wisdom to offer the following contrarian perspective: The election will not be close.

Before you sit down to your computer to begin your "Williams have you lost your mind?" rant, hear me out. I have reached this conclusion for two reasons.

My first reason is shaped by what polls cannot see.

When I was in Philadelphia last week, the Philadelphia Inquirer ran a story in the local section that addressed increased voter registration.

The final day of voter registration in Pennsylvania and New Jersey last week brought huge crowds to registration offices.

As of September, Philadelphia had received 219,000 applications from either new voters or those who had moved or had been stricken from the rolls. With some 60,000 applications arriving on the final day, it is possible the city's volume this year could break the record of 293,000 applications set in the tension-filled mayoral race of 1983 between Wilson Goode and Frank Rizzo.

Moreover, this trend of increased voter registration is replicated, in particular, in a majority of the battleground states.

According to the New York Times, voter registration campaigns in heavily Democratic areas have added tens of thousands of new voters to the rolls in the swing states of Ohio and Florida, a surge that far exceeds the efforts of Republicans in both states.

The analysis by the Times of county-by-county data shows that in Democratic areas of Ohio -- primarily low-income and minority neighborhoods -- new registrations since January have risen 250 percent over the same period in 2000.

In comparison, new registrations have increased just 25 percent in Republican areas. A similar pattern is apparent in Florida: In the strongest Democratic areas, the pace of new registration is 60 percent higher than in 2000, while it has risen just 12 percent in the heaviest Republican areas.

Project Vote says it has registered 147,000 new voters in Ohio.

Americans Coming Together said that, together with allied groups that are part of America Votes, it had registered 300,000 new voters.

In New Mexico, the Secretary of State's office reports that since May voter registration has jumped from approximately 958,000 to a little more than

1 million, possibly all new registrants.

Those younger than 30 who are increasingly concerned about a potential draft are also registering in increased numbers.

These new registrants are not considered in most polling. A growing number of young people use cell phones as their primary phone number.

This further diminishes the possibility that their support for either candidate would be reflected in polling data. Thus, they are the great unknown in this election.

My second reason, if history is any barometer, is that when incumbent presidents seek re-election, it is a referendum on the previous four years. Since 1932, 11 incumbent presidents have sought re-election; with the possible exception of 1948 and 1976, none of the races has been close.

When we want to keep a president, we keep him; Roosevelt, Eisenhower, Johnson, Nixon, Reagan and Clinton are prime examples. Likewise, when we want him out, he's out: Hoover, Carter and Bush 41.

More and more this race is shaping up like 1980. That race remained close until the last few weeks, when voters found a comfort level with then-challenger Ronald Reagan that allowed them to oust President Carter.

It difficult for me to believe the race is as close as the polls indicate, especially when one considers that 56 percent of the electorate feels the country is headed in the wrong direction.

Moreover, it has been 16 months since 50 percent felt we were headed in the right direction.

When one factors the increased voter registration that is unaccounted for in the current polling, along with recent presidential history, I don't believe we will be in court discussing hanging, dimpled or pregnant chads on Nov. 3.

Byron Williams is an Oakland pastor and syndicated columnist.

ism
10-15-2004, 07:51 PM
The lessons of 2000 being recent, I think young voters have more impetus to vote this time around. Shit I'm drunk i'll finish this later.