PDA

View Full Version : Evidence Bush skipped out on service


hooligan
09-08-2004, 08:41 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/09/08/bush.national.ap/index.html

bush records vs. kerry records = kerry pwns
Lawsuit uncovers Bush Guard records

Report: Memos obtained from Bush commander

Wednesday, September 8, 2004 Posted: 10:58 PM EDT (0258 GMT)

ASHINGTON (AP) -- Democrats pounced on the latest revelations about President Bush's Air National Guard service Wednesday, saying newly released records show Bush shirked his duty and lied about it.

Bush's spokesmen said the records back up the president's assertion that he fulfilled all of his Vietnam-era military obligations and served honorably.

Meanwhile, the Texas Air National Guard released 128 pages of records on Bush's service from 1968 to 1973, all of which had been previously released by the White House. Two Texas officials said in sworn affidavits that the records were all the Texas Guard had on Bush's service.

CBS reported Wednesday night that it had obtained personal files from one of Bush's Texas commanders saying Bush (http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/special/president/candidates/bush.new.html) discussed with him how to avoid drills during 1972. The report on "60 Minutes" said the files were from the personal records of Col. Jerry Killian, who died in 1984.

In the memos, Killian complained of pressure from higher-ups to give Bush positive evaluations and said Bush talked about how to avoid taking a physical exam in 1972, when Bush eventually skipped six months of training and lost his pilot's wings for missing the exam.

After the broadcast, the White House, without comment, released to the news media two of the memos, one ordering Bush to report for his physical exam and the other suspending him from flight status.

With national security and the war on terrorism looming large on voters' minds, supporters of Bush and Democratic nominee John Kerry are attacking each candidate's Vietnam War records. Republicans have accused Kerry (http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/special/president/candidates/kerry.new.html), a decorated Vietnam combat veteran, of fabricating the events which led to his five medals. Democrats point to gaps in Bush's stateside Air National Guard service in 1972 and 1973 to say Bush shirked his duty.

The Defense Department on Tuesday released more than two dozen pages of records about Bush and his former Texas unit. They showed Bush flew for 336 hours in military jets after his flight training and ranked in the middle of his class.

The latest records do not shed any light on key questions about Bush's service: whether or where he trained in late 1972 and early 1973, why he skipped a required medical exam and whether he was investigated or punished for skipping the exam and six months' worth of training in 1972.

Pentagon officials said they discovered the documents released Tuesday while performing a more comprehensive search "out of an abundance of caution" in response to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit by The Associated Press.

The newly released records also showed that while Bush says he was in Alabama training with another Guard unit in 1972, his home unit in Texas was participating in the air defense of the southern United States by keeping two jet fighters constantly ready for launch within five minutes' notice.

Democrats said that meant Bush passed on a chance to defend his country. Bush flew the F-102A jets his unit kept on alert but was grounded in August 1972 because of the missed medical check.

"When his unit was placed on a 24-hour alert mission to protect our country from surprise attack, why did George Bush not report for duty?" Democratic National Committee head Terry McAuliffe said in a conference call with reporters Wednesday.

McAuliffe also suggested Bush lied when he said he had released all available records and had fulfilled his Guard obligations.

"Either George Bush was deliberately lying to the American public or he had some type of very severe memory loss," McAuliffe said.

Bush spokesmen scoffed. They said the Pentagon had not done the extensive search Bush ordered and noted that Bush had approval to train in late 1972 with an Alabama unit.

"If the president had not fulfilled his commitment he would not have been honorably discharged," Bush spokesman Scott McClellan said Wednesday.

Adding to the criticism of Bush, a group called Texans for Truth announced an advertising campaign questioning whether Bush ever trained with the Alabama Air National Guard. The advertisement, set to run in several swing states, quotes a retired lieutenant colonel in the Alabama unit who says he searched for Bush but never met him in 1972 or 1973.

Bob Mintz is another of more than a dozen former members of the 187th Tactical Reconnaissance Group who say they never saw Bush train with the unit. Medical records released by the White House show Bush received a dental exam at the 187th base in January 1973.

"I never met the man and I'm sorry I didn't because he's somebody important," Mintz, 63, said in a conference call with reporters Wednesday. Mintz acknowledged Bush could have performed office duties for the 187th without crossing paths with Mintz.

The 128 pages of documents the Texas Air National Guard released to the AP on Wednesday duplicate records Bush released in February. The release also included sworn statements from Texas National Guard officials Travis Evans and Michael Blalock saying the records are the only ones related to Bush in the Texas Guard's files.



doesn't anyone think it's funny that the group criticism bush is called "Texans for Truth"?

yoMAMA
09-08-2004, 09:40 PM
Bush is UNFIT to be commander in chief.

What a fucking hypocrite.

:mad:

hooligan
09-08-2004, 09:45 PM
Bush is UNFIT to be commander in chief.

What a fucking hypocrite.

:mad:
according to some radio show on KPFK, they said that this is comparable to treason. he skipped out on duty during war time. if you believe that we were in a war situation during vietnam. going awol during war time is a crime punishable by death according to military court.

yoMAMA
09-08-2004, 09:49 PM
according to some radio show on KPFK, they said that this is comparable to treason. he skipped out on duty during war time. if you believe that we were in a war situation during vietnam. going awol during war time is a crime punishable by death according to military court.

Double standards....

and that other yale guy who volunteered to go to vietnam is just a liar and war criminal.....




And better yet, Dick Cheney declared today that "a vote for kerry is a vote for the terrorist".... :rolleyes:




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

September 9, 2004
OP-ED COLUMNIST
Cheney Spits Toads
By MAUREEN DOWD

WASHINGTON — George W. Bush and Dick Cheney have always used the president's father as a reverse lodestar. In 1992, the senior Mr. Bush wooed the voters with "Message: I care.'' So this week, Mr. Cheney wooed the voters with, Message: You die.

The terrible beauty of its simplicity grows on you. It is a sign of the dark, macho, paranoid vice president's restraint that he didn't really take it to its emotionally satisfying conclusion: Message: Vote for us or we'll kill you.

Without Zell Miller around to out-crazy him, and unplugged after a convention that tried to "humanize'' him with grandchildren, horses and wifely anecdotes about his inability to dance the twist, Mr. Cheney is back as Terrifier in Chief.

He finally simply spit out what the Bush team has been more subtly trying to convey for months: A vote for John Kerry is a vote for the terrorists.

"Because if we make the wrong choice,'' Mr. Cheney said in Des Moines in that calm baritone, "then the danger is that we'll get hit again. That we'll be hit in a way that will be devastating from the standpoint of the United States, and that we'll fall back into the pre-9/11 mind-set if you will, that in fact these terrorist attacks are just criminal acts, and that we're not really at war.''

These guys figure, hey, these scare tactics worked in building support for the Iraq war, maybe they can work in tearing down support for John Kerry. They linked Saddam with terrorism and cowed the Democrats (including Mr. Kerry, who has never been able to make the case against the Bush administration's trompe l'oeil casus belli) and fooled the country into going along with their trumped-up war. So why not link Mr. Kerry with terrorism and cow the voters into sticking with the White House they've got?

It's like that fairy tale where vipers and toads jump out of the mouth of the accursed mean little girl when she tries to speak. Every time Mr. Cheney opens his mouth, vermin leap out.

The vice president and president did not even mention Osama at the convention because of the inconvenient fact that the fiend is still out there, plotting. Yet they denigrate Mr. Kerry as too weak to battle Osama, and treat him as a greater threat.

Mr. Cheney implies that John Kerry couldn't protect us from an attack like 9/11, blithely ignoring the fact that he and President Bush didn't protect us from the real 9/11. Think of what brass-knuckled Republicans could have made of a 9/11 tape of an uncertain Democratic president giving a shaky statement that looked like a hostage tape and flying randomly from air base to air base, as the veep ordered that planes be shot down.

Mr. Cheney warns against falling back "into the pre-9/11 mind-set,'' when, in fact, the Bush team's pre-9/11 mind-set was all about being stuck in the cold war and reviving "Star Wars" - which doesn't work and is useless against terrorist tactics. The Bush crowd played down terrorism because Bill Clinton and Sandy Berger had told their successors that Osama was a priority, and the Bushies scorned all things Clinton. The president shrugged off intelligence briefings with such headlines as "Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States'' because there was brush to be cleared and unaffordable tax-cutting to be done.

After the blue-ribbon graybeards declared the Bush administration's pumped-up W.M.D. claims and Saddam-9/11 links bogus, the White House went into a defensive crouch - especially the man in the undisclosed bunker, who had veered wildly between overly pessimistic predictions of Saddam's nukes and overly optimistic predictions of grateful Iraqis with flowers and chocolates.

For a time, it seemed that Americans were realizing they'd been flimflammed by the Bushies. But at the convention, the swaggering Bush juggernaut brazenly went back to boasting about its pre-emption doctrine, tracing imaginary connections between 9/11 and Saddam, and calling all our foes terrorists.

Why should the same group that managed to paint a flextime guardsman as a heroic commander - and a war hero as a war criminal - bother rebutting or engaging with critics?

As the deaths of American men and women fighting in Iraq topped 1,000, and with insurgents controlling parts of central Iraq, the White House trotted out the same old discredited line, assuming it can wear - and scare - everyone down by November.


Thomas L. Friedman is on leave until October, writing a book.



Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company

hooligan
09-08-2004, 09:50 PM
haha, that's great, it's a dirty fucking election.

yoMAMA
09-08-2004, 10:11 PM
haha, that's great, it's a dirty fucking election.

It's comical and almost kafkaesque.

I mean we are not that fucking stupid!

Yeahman
09-08-2004, 11:21 PM
according to some radio show on KPFK, they said that this is comparable to treason. he skipped out on duty during war time. if you believe that we were in a war situation during vietnam. going awol during war time is a crime punishable by death according to military court.
No it's not. Desertion is punishable by death during war. AWOL is not.
Bush didn't desert. He just didn't show up. The appropriate punishment should have been to call him up for active duty but oddly records show that despite not showing up he was certified as having fufilled his requirements.

hooligan
09-08-2004, 11:58 PM
No it's not. Desertion is punishable by death during war. AWOL is not.
Bush didn't desert. He just didn't show up. The appropriate punishment should have been to call him up for active duty but oddly records show that despite not showing up he was certified as having fufilled his requirements.
He would have been serving 24 months in Vietnam had they caught him.

Mr.Lum
09-09-2004, 03:48 AM
No it's not. Desertion is punishable by death during war. AWOL is not.
Bush didn't desert. He just didn't show up. The appropriate punishment should have been to call him up for active duty but oddly records show that despite not showing up he was certified as having fufilled his requirements.

LOL. The man is shady. I wouldn't trust him with my lunch money.