achtungbaby
08-07-2004, 06:13 PM
Maybe now Republicans can start donating their money to their candidate.
SACRAMENTO - Ralph Nader (news - web sites) failed to gather enough signatures to make the ballot in California as an independent presidential candidate, but his campaign said Saturday it will keep trying to get the consumer activist's name before the state's voters in November.
State election officials said Nader fell far short of the 153,035 signatures needed by Friday's deadline. He submitted 82,923 with 56 of the state's 58 counties reporting, said Lauren Hersh, a spokeswoman for the secretary of state's office.
Nader's campaign coordinator in California, Forrest Hill, said he thought the final tally was "closer to 100,000."
"It was very difficult collecting these signatures, as you can imagine," he said Saturday. "We tried to get some help, but the paid signature gatherers did not work for more than a week or two. They all quit. They said it was too abusive, the attacks that went on" from people opposed to Nader's candidacy.
Hill said the campaign was trying to convince Green Party members in California to dump David Cobb, a Eureka lawyer, as their presidential nominee and substitute Nader, who was the Green Party presidential candidate in 2000. But Hill conceded that effort was a long shot.
The Greens have until Aug. 26 to decide which candidate they want on the ballot in California, said Hersh.
Beth Moore Haines, a spokeswoman for the Green Party of California, said changing nominees was highly unlikely.
"I think there would be considerable cost to California in good will toward the rest of the Greens in the nation, if we did something like that," she told The Sacramento Bee.
Hill said the Nader campaign could also try to get Nader on the ballot by going to court to challenge the state's signature threshold for independent candidates.
Nader received only 2 percent of the California vote in a Field Poll released this week. Democratic nominee John Kerry (news - web sites) led President Bush (news - web sites) 51 percent to 40 percent in that survey of 633 likely voters. The margin of error was 4.1 percent.
SACRAMENTO - Ralph Nader (news - web sites) failed to gather enough signatures to make the ballot in California as an independent presidential candidate, but his campaign said Saturday it will keep trying to get the consumer activist's name before the state's voters in November.
State election officials said Nader fell far short of the 153,035 signatures needed by Friday's deadline. He submitted 82,923 with 56 of the state's 58 counties reporting, said Lauren Hersh, a spokeswoman for the secretary of state's office.
Nader's campaign coordinator in California, Forrest Hill, said he thought the final tally was "closer to 100,000."
"It was very difficult collecting these signatures, as you can imagine," he said Saturday. "We tried to get some help, but the paid signature gatherers did not work for more than a week or two. They all quit. They said it was too abusive, the attacks that went on" from people opposed to Nader's candidacy.
Hill said the campaign was trying to convince Green Party members in California to dump David Cobb, a Eureka lawyer, as their presidential nominee and substitute Nader, who was the Green Party presidential candidate in 2000. But Hill conceded that effort was a long shot.
The Greens have until Aug. 26 to decide which candidate they want on the ballot in California, said Hersh.
Beth Moore Haines, a spokeswoman for the Green Party of California, said changing nominees was highly unlikely.
"I think there would be considerable cost to California in good will toward the rest of the Greens in the nation, if we did something like that," she told The Sacramento Bee.
Hill said the Nader campaign could also try to get Nader on the ballot by going to court to challenge the state's signature threshold for independent candidates.
Nader received only 2 percent of the California vote in a Field Poll released this week. Democratic nominee John Kerry (news - web sites) led President Bush (news - web sites) 51 percent to 40 percent in that survey of 633 likely voters. The margin of error was 4.1 percent.