PDA

View Full Version : Eye Candy of I, Robot


kitty
07-20-2004, 08:03 AM
Eye Candy of I, Robot

Perhaps we're finally seeing the return of the sci fi film. After a lengthy sabbatical, during which time such fantasy flicks as Lord of the Rings triumphed over breakthrough blockbuster science fiction as the Matrix, I, Robot just might be signalling America's returning tolerance for grittier imaginings of technophile futures.

Starring Will Smith as himself (while the man is quite a tasty-looking morsel, no one ever accused him of being a talented actor; in this film, his character's is detective Del Spooner, though he is really more of an unholy mating between Craig David and Kurt Russell with the usual Will Smith, pretty-boy charm), I, Robot is a screenplay loosely based on Isaac Asimov's novel of the same name, with most of the intellectualized, slow-paced mystery excised and a lot of expensive special effects and mindless action tossed in. Essentially, it's the perfect summer blockbuster.

Spooner, a die-hard technophobe trapped in an origin story for the Matrix, finds himself unravelling the mystery behind Dr. Alfred Lanning's (James Cromwell) apparent suicide. Lanning is a good friend and president of the biggest robotics firm of the nation. Enlisted in Spooner's half-cocked vendetta is Dr. Susan Calvin (Bridget Moynahan), a psychiatrist who had been hired by Lanning's firm to anthropomorphize the newest line of robots scheduled to be distributed later that week, and a mysterious android (voiced by Alan Tudyk) who had borne witness to Lanning's death and is the primary suspect for what Spooner believes is a murder case, is the final member of the film's cast.

Of course, what first catches the eye in I, Robot, is the blistering special effects. Direct Alex Proyas is completely cognizant of what draws audiences to a film of this callibre, and he wastes no money in producing some mind-blowingly extravagant action, all of which is greatly benefitted by the fact that few if any of the best action scenes were shown in the trailer, thus maintaining the element of surprise when they are revealed in the course of the film's plot. As revolutionary as when bullet-time was first introduced, Proyas' use of CGI effects and other cutting edge camerawork technology allows for some intricate and edge-of-your-seat action climaxes, that leave the audience breathlessly satisfied. More importantly, Proyas also uses his tech budget to add some well-placed bells and whistles to Spooner's world, creating a rather complete and detailed universe of high-tech gadgetry, perfectly capturing the context in which the story is told.

Moreover, Alan Tudyk is compelling as the voice actor of the emotional android that Spooner suspects to be the Lanning's murderer. The CGI department designed Tudyk's character extremely well, melding the iPod-esque feel of new-age technology seamlessly with an expressive and disturbingly human face, that makes Tudyk's android one of the most charming and passionate characters of the film.

What is a little annoying, if the audience stopped to think about it, was the film's unfortunate lack of attention to plot and predictable, albeit occasionally witty, screenplay. While the story is fine for a summer blockbuster, there certainly could've been room to add a little more intellectualism to the story. The best aspects of the screenplay were derived from Asimov's work, and while there is certainly food for thought inherent in I, Robot's premise, Proyas doesn't expect his audience (of primarily male 13 year olds, one assumes) to want to exercise their brains, and so the 'mystery' of Lanning's death is actually hardly a mystery at all. Rather, it's all an excuse to lead Spooner from one death-defying stunt to another.

While I, Robot also delivers enough plot to rationalize the character of Dr. Susan Calvin, this reviewer is still left to wonder what exactly it is about mainstream Hollywood films that require any ethnic male protagonist to be shackled to a white female heroine. Though not nearly as bad as the supposed premise that introduced Tea Leoni as the white female of the day in Smith's earlier work in Bad Boys (1995), Moynahan's character still feels superfluous and rather unnecessary. It seems that Hollywood feels that a male person of colour cannot, by himself, carry a movie, even if it's Will Smith, Morgan Freeman, or Jet Li. In fact, most if not all of Jet Li and Jackie Chan's American movies feature a Caucasian woman to play either theoretical (rather than portrayed) love interest, or as scenery to hold the attention of the white male moviegoer. And let us not forget the travesty that is Morgan Freeman's recent roles, such as Along Came a Spider and High Crimes. The only exception to this rule seems to be if you've got two or more male protagonists of (usually differing) racial minorities, such as with Rush Hour or From the Cradle 2 The Grave. Here, in order to shy away from that United Nations feel, Hollywood opts to forgo the white woman heroine for women of at least one of the protagonist's ethnicities.

So, it is with a grain of salt that one examines the role of Dr. Susan Calvin in I, Robot, knowing that Bridget Moynahan is little more than a Hollywood ploy to give the white audience members a reason to watch a male protagonist they 'cannot identify with'. Still, the racial politics of filmmaking aside, I, Robot is an entertaining bang for your buck, and this reviewer predicts it will be the best (and prettiest, both in terms of the special effects and the man-meat) of this summer's blockbuster hits.

TB4000
07-20-2004, 10:15 AM
Have you read any little snippets of Asimov's work, jenn? The movie tried to portray a few of his ideas, and for the most part it got that one short story called Hardwired down, but the rest was pretty much all liberties taken.

kitty
07-20-2004, 10:58 AM
Have you read any little snippets of Asimov's work, jenn? The movie tried to portray a few of his ideas, and for the most part it got that one short story called Hardwired down, but the rest was pretty much all liberties taken.

I read a summary of I, Robot for this review. I wasn't aware that it was trying to take from a number of different short stories, I thought it was inspired only from the one I, Robot story.

my bad. :)

mr. x
07-20-2004, 12:08 PM
and u notice how the most physical they got was she touched his robotic arm veins, i mean they didnt even kiss (thats probly so the bible belt doesnt go vomiting in the streets)

and yeah, ditto about will smith as himself, basically it pretty much felt like one of those modern man in futuristic times kinda movies. i think while there were some great visuals they had a hard time completely fleshing out the world cuz the humans themselves werent entirely believable

take the part where will gets assaulted by the USR truck full of robots, afterwards his superiors like "uh, what robots" and stuff, iono how to explain it, but its like apparently this world they live in is so perfect that a hollywood explosion in the middle of a freeway is just unthinkable.

kitty
07-20-2004, 12:34 PM
and u notice how the most physical they got was she touched his robotic arm veins, i mean they didnt even kiss (thats probly so the bible belt doesnt go vomiting in the streets)


good thoughts on the believability of the people -- i think that's why this movie will meld the rift between sci fi and fantasy because you have the clear-cut good vs. evil of a fantasy movie with the effects of a sci fi. hopefully it'll eventually pave the way for the return for the daker, more intellectual and more morally ambiguous sci fi movies.

the question also is whether or not the girl and will smith were intended to be romantic leads. if you think about it, a romance isn't really hinted between them.

mr. x
07-21-2004, 12:07 AM
good thoughts on the believability of the people -- i think that's why this movie will meld the rift between sci fi and fantasy because you have the clear-cut good vs. evil of a fantasy movie with the effects of a sci fi. hopefully it'll eventually pave the way for the return for the daker, more intellectual and more morally ambiguous sci fi movies.

the question also is whether or not the girl and will smith were intended to be romantic leads. if you think about it, a romance isn't really hinted between them.
but as much as asian guys complain that black guys get some action while asians dont (from white women particularly) its not really true, in a big budget hollywood production, unless the plot itself is about some fragile IR relationship between a black man and white woman the movie will NOT have any romanticness between them

kitty
07-21-2004, 07:37 AM
but as much as asian guys complain that black guys get some action while asians dont (from white women particularly) its not really true, in a big budget hollywood production, unless the plot itself is about some fragile IR relationship between a black man and white woman the movie will NOT have any romanticness between them

that's true, although black men ARE usually cast as much more sexually agressive or 'macho'.

mr. x
07-21-2004, 11:23 AM
that's true, although black men ARE usually cast as much more sexually agressive or 'macho'.
but a lot of whites are still uncomfortable with that of course

i mean the extreme would be something like Big Black Dicks, Lil White Chicks. and can you honestly see white guys actively watching those movies?

kitty
07-21-2004, 01:27 PM
yeah. have you ever checked out stuff like blacks on blondes? white people are into shit like that.

mr. x
07-21-2004, 10:03 PM
yeah. have you ever checked out stuff like blacks on blondes? white people are into shit like that.
serious? i duno, i cant really imagine a white fratboy sitting there watching it and sympathizing with a huge black phallus unless he was in a mixed frat with his black buddies and they were yucking it up

kitty
07-22-2004, 05:30 AM
serious? i duno, i cant really imagine a white fratboy sitting there watching it and sympathizing with a huge black phallus unless he was in a mixed frat with his black buddies and they were yucking it up

they make stuff like that because people (white people too) have these interracial fetishes where they like seeing pristine white women being torn up by big black bucks.

mr. x
07-22-2004, 11:00 PM
they make stuff like that because people (white people too) have these interracial fetishes where they like seeing pristine white women being torn up by big black bucks.
now that i think about it, it makes sense

my uh, friend tells me a lot of porn is the shock factor

anyway kitty i think we should end our big black dick porno discussion lest it derail the original topic at hand

kitty
07-23-2004, 10:39 AM
true.

anyways. will smith. robots. did anyone else want a pet robot after seeing this movie?

mr. x
07-23-2004, 10:44 AM
true.

anyways. will smith. robots. did anyone else want a pet robot after seeing this movie?
you mean like a sony asimo? :rolleyes:

i always imagine this scenario

man: oh (robot) come scratch this part of my back i cant reach

robot: (scratches)

man: a lil higher....

robot: (pulls out knife, stabs man in back)

man: AAAAAAA, yeah thats the spot

>:^|
07-23-2004, 11:42 AM
Have you read any little snippets of Asimov's work, jenn? The movie tried to portray a few of his ideas, and for the most part it got that one short story called Hardwired down, but the rest was pretty much all liberties taken.

Which part did it try to portray and what did it take liberties with? I read a lot of Asimov a long time ago so I unfortunately can't remember much. :^P

I do remember that Susan Calvin was portrayed as a very rigid type and she pops up in many of his stories. Is she a hot babe in this movie?

Interesting review, kittygirl. Thanks!

SunWuKong
07-24-2004, 03:05 PM
did anybody else see the anti-war undertone in this movie?

the humans, when left to their own devices, causes too much deaths amongst themselves with their violence and war. the robots, thinking they know what's best for the humans, must step in to take control of the humans. they take control physically, while at the same time emphasizing that they want to minimise casualties.

kitty
07-24-2004, 03:11 PM
did anybody else see the anti-war undertone in this movie?

the humans, when left to their own devices, causes too much deaths amongst themselves with their violence and war. the robots, thinking they know what's best for the humans, must step in to take control of the humans. they take control physically, while at the same time emphasizing that they want to minimise casualties.

yeah... i saw that... but it was really subtle. i don't know how intentional it was.

Irezumi Kiss
07-24-2004, 04:25 PM
anyway kitty i think we should end our big black dick porno discussion lest it derail the original topic at hand
If you two ever come to New York City, both of your first round drinks are on ME.

:wink:

Upon reflection, I felt that having seen Minority Report killed some of the edge off of this, but I still enjoyed watching it. Came out of the theater quite..."recharged."

the question also is whether or not the girl and will smith were intended to be romantic leads. if you think about it, a romance isn't really hinted between them.
Really? I thought there was a definite air of attraction and a smidge of flirtation between Smith and Monyhan's characters, especially at the end, where the both of them are looking at each other and the smiling is like, "I'd love to see the other parts of you that aren't so robotic."

Or maybe that's something I wanted to see for myself, being a black man and having a little jones for Monyhan?

yeeesh this is why I hate thinking too much for a movie like this!

:biggrin:

mr. x
07-24-2004, 09:08 PM
did anybody else see the anti-war undertone in this movie?

the humans, when left to their own devices, causes too much deaths amongst themselves with their violence and war. the robots, thinking they know what's best for the humans, must step in to take control of the humans. they take control physically, while at the same time emphasizing that they want to minimise casualties.
well, the humans won didnt they? and in the end they pointed their big mighty tanks at the now submissive robots, so humans are free to continue their warring

SunWuKong
07-25-2004, 07:14 AM
well, the humans won didnt they? and in the end they pointed their big mighty tanks at the now submissive robots, so humans are free to continue their warring

well, let me be more specific: anti-Iraq occupation.

PropellerheadCP
07-25-2004, 08:46 AM
well, let me be more specific: anti-Iraq occupation.

I highly doubt it was intentional. Coincidental, perhaps.

kitty
07-25-2004, 08:59 AM
i thought it was more anti-colonial in general, but definitely in the context of current events, anti-Iraq occupation. however, i agree with propeller that it was probably more coincidental than intentional.